Alabama fertility care in limbo as lawmakers discuss legislation
A container with frozen embryos and sperm stored in liquid nitrogen is removed at a fertility clinic in Fort Myers, Fla., Tuesday, Oct. 2, 2018. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled, Friday, Feb. 16, 2024, that frozen embryos can be considered children under state law, a ruling critics said could have sweeping implications for fertility treatments. The decision was issued in a pair of wrongful death cases brought by three couples who had frozen embryos destroyed in an accident at a fertility clinic.
About a decade ago, Kristia Rumbley and her husband tried to get pregnant, but after two years of trying with no success, they turned to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
“It is probably the most hellacious time you can ever go through,” Rumbley said. “We knew we only had one shot at it. However many embryos we could get, we couldn’t afford to do IVF again.”
The procedure yielded several embryos, two of which were transferred to Rumbley’s uterus and successfully implanted, resulting in a pregnancy with twins.
Her doctors in Birmingham froze the remaining embryos. Years later, they transferred another one, which resulted in another pregnancy.
Rumbley and her husband have two frozen embryos left. They aren’t sure if they want to try for another pregnancy, donate the embryos or discard them. But they don’t feel safe keeping them in Alabama anymore.
“We don’t know yet what we’re going to do. We just know that we’re not ready for somebody else to tell us what to do with them,” Rumbley said.
The couple wants to move their embryos out of state because of a recent ruling from Alabama’s Supreme Court.
On Feb. 16, the court declared that people can file wrongful death lawsuits over the destruction of frozen embryos. Justices said a state civil law from 1872 protects all children, including “extrauterine children.”
The ruling sparked national outcry from fertility providers and patients, and it prompted at least three Alabama clinics to pause IVF procedures. In response to the pushback, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have pledged to pass legislation to protect access to fertility treatments.
But as they discuss taking action, patients are losing access to care.
“This feels very much like the door just got blown wide open, and we have no idea what’s on the other side of it,” said Dr. Beth Malizia, a reproductive endocrinologist and part owner of Alabama Fertility, a private clinic with offices across the state.
The practice announced last week it was stopping all new IVF procedures due to legal risk.
“We are working as hard as we can to alert our legislators as to the far reaching negative impact of this ruling on the women of Alabama,” the clinic posted on Facebook last week. “At a time when we feel so powerless, advocacy and awareness is our strongest tools.”
Malizia said the situation has added unnecessary anxiety to a process that is already fraught with emotion.
“Especially from a patient perspective, (it’s) just so devastating,” she said. “I have patients who have been calling and we are offering the best guidance we can, day by day. But that is a constant evolving process.”
Providers at the Center for Reproductive Medicine in Mobile and at the University of Alabama at Birmingham have also paused IVF procedures due to legal concern.
“We are saddened that this will impact our patients’ attempt to have a baby through IVF,” UAB officials wrote in a statement. “But we must evaluate the potential that our patients and our physicians could be prosecuted criminally or face punitive damages for following the standard of care for IVF treatments.”
Some fertility providers are continuing without much interruption.
At the Fertility Institute of North Alabama, Dr. Brett Davenport said their practice is “going to perform IVF as we always have.”
Davenport said he doesn’t think state laws were meant to be applied to frozen embryos and he is hopeful state legislators will act quickly to protect fertility care.
“We are considered a pro-life state,” Davenport said. “What’s so ironic about that is there’s not anything a lot more pro-life than a fertility practice trying to help couples who can’t conceive, conceive a baby.”
Last week, Democratic state lawmakers introduced legislation to clarify that a human embryo outside of the uterus does not equal an unborn child. Republican legislators are expected to introduce separate legislation this week, which they say will also protect access to IVF.
In anticipation of a possible public hearing on the bills, fertility providers and patients are organizing an advocacy event Wednesday in Montgomery to express their support for fertility care.
UAB building among Alabama’s first to feature ‘bird safe’ glass
Advocates hope the new glass will prevent window collisions, a leading causes of bird mortality.
Researchers look into community health impact of wood pellet production in rural Mississippi
Brown University and Tougaloo College students are testing for potential air and noise pollution near the Drax wood pellet plant in Gloster, Mississippi.
Alabama coal company sued for a home explosion is delinquent on dozens of penalties
Crimson Oak Grove Resources has been cited for 204 safety violations since the March 8 blast, many involving “significant and substantial” safety violations.
The United Auto Workers faces a key test in the South with upcoming vote at Alabama Mercedes plant
The United Auto Workers is aiming for a key victory at Mercedes-Benz in Alabama. More than 5,000 workers at the facility in Vance and nearby battery plant will vote this week on whether to join the UAW.
Gambling, ethics bills fall short as legislative session ends
Alabama lawmakers closed the books on this year’s regular legislative session Thursday. While Republican leaders passed many of their priority bills, perhaps the most talked about issue – gambling – died.
A look at what passed and failed in the 2024 legislative session
Alabama lawmakers have ended a 2024 legislative session that saw the Republican majority win approval for a number of their top priorities.
