Supreme Court to hear challenge to California’s authority to set vehicle emissions standards

Can the federal government have a favorite when it comes to states? The Supreme Court said on Friday that it would hear a case that tests that assertion in the context of a state that imposes tougher clean air standards than the federal government.

In this case, the so-called “golden child” is California. Under a provision of the Clean Air Act that was enacted in 1967, California was explicitly allowed to set its own motor vehicle emissions standards because of the unique pollution problem in the state. The problems were unique in both character and intensity because the state then, as now, had more motor vehicles than any other state in the country, and California had already enacted new air pollution standards that were actually tougher than the ones in the federal law.

With auto manufacturers complaining that they couldn’t deal with 50 different state standards, the congressional compromise was to allow California’s existing and stricter standards to remain in place, and to require other states to either abide by federal air quality standards, or if they wished, to adopt air quality standards that would be “identical” to the existing California standards.

Technically, all this was accomplished through a system in which the Environmental Protection Agency set emission standards for new motor vehicles, and granted waivers for more demanding standards.

But in 2019 the Trump administration withdrew the waiver for California’s tougher standards on cars, and the state challenged that action in court. The case, however, was not resolved, and when President Biden took office, the EPA reinstated the waiver.

Now Ohio and 16 other Republican-dominated states have sued, asserting that the waiver violates the basic design of the U.S. Constitution, which they assert should treat states as equals. Environmental groups allege that the GOP states have no intention of adopting standards that are anything like California’s regulations; rather, they contend, this is an effort to gut the Clean Air Act itself.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the EPA, finding that the Constitution does not bar Congress from leaving states with different levels of sovereign authority. Now the Supreme Court will decide.

 

Supreme Court to consider whether Catholic group is exempt from religious taxes

At issue is whether the charity Catholic Charities is qualified to be exempt from state unemployment taxes as a religious institution.

The Best of 2024: Our favorite movies, TV, books, music and games, all in one place

Your one-stop guide to the year in arts and culture, from binge-worthy shows to hundreds of books recommended by NPR staff and a playlist of the 124 best songs of 2024.

Paula Abdul settles suit alleging sexual assault by ‘Idol’ producer Nigel Lythgoe

Paula Abdul and former American Idol producer Nigel Lythgoe have agreed to settle a lawsuit in which she alleged he sexually assaulted her in the early 2000s when she was a judge on the show.

Texas challenges shield laws by suing New York doctor who prescribed abortion pills

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed the lawsuit against a New York doctor who prescribed abortion pills for a client near Dallas, pitting an abortion ban against laws that protect physicians.

McKinsey & Company to pay $650 million for role in opioid crisis

The powerful consulting firm McKinsey will "accept responsibility" and pay $650 million for helping to fuel the opioid crisis, but executives will once again dodge prosecution.

What’s your surprise holiday recipe or ingredient? Here’s your chance to tell NPR

Tell us what your favorite unexpected recipes and ingredients are when cooking during the holidays.

More Front Page Coverage