Is Trump pick Pete Hegseth ready to run Defense? A former defense secretary weighs in
What does it take to run the Department of Defense?
It is one of the largest, most complex entities in the U.S. government.
There are more than 3 million employees, including civilians and military service members. Former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the department has its own judicial code, legal system and healthcare system.
Hagel, who was in charge from 2013 to 2015, told All Things Considered host Mary Louise Kelly that it is the “largest institution in the world.”
Hagel joined the program to explain the challenges President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee, Pete Hegseth, might inherit.
If confirmed, Hegseth would be the least experienced defense secretary in American history.
This interview has been lightly edited for length and clarity.
Interview highlights
Mary Louise Kelly: President-elect Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon is Pete Hegseth. He is a Fox News host. He’s a veteran of the Army National Guard. He has never run a big organization. NPR Pentagon correspondent Tom Bowman reviewed the biographies of defense secretaries and secretaries of war. He says, “Without a doubt, Hegseth has the least experience.” What questions does that raise?
Chuck Hagel: I think that is an issue, and I think the Senate confirmation process will bring that up. The confirmation process of these big jobs is so critically important. I think, though, it’s more than just experience. It’s the complete persona of all who you are and what you bring to the job.
Kelly: You wrote an opinion essay for The New York Times titled, “Why I’m Worried About Our Military.” You write, “Political independence and ethics are the bedrock of our military today. I’m concerned that both are in danger.” Secretary Hagel, why?
Hagel: If the military is ever politicized in any way – and we’re seeing some indications from this incoming administration that it may be. For example, the “Warriors” group – a group that President-elect Trump has talked about evaluating generals and admirals, making decisions about whether those people are qualified to lead the military or not, or if they’ve made mistakes and then recommending to the president that he fire them – that’s politicizing the military. And the things that Mr. Hegseth said about the military – that does concern me in every way.
Kelly: May I ask what remarks are giving you pause?
Hagel: Yes. For example, women should not be in combat. You know, we passed that marker a long time ago, this issue of diversity in the military.
Kelly: Just to put a point on this, Trump’s nominee, Pete Hegseth, has suggested he would look to remove senior officers that he sees as “too woke.” He has included the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in that. My question to you: Can he do that?
Hagel: Well, the president of the United States has the authority to fire any federal employee. He can do that. When you start talking about firing the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, whose record is as impressive as any record we’ve seen – when you talk about firing him because of so-called “woke” – what do you mean by that? That’s what’s so dangerous here, and that’s why I’m so concerned. If, in fact, this administration follows through on these things, then we’re in for a lot of trouble.
Kelly: What when you say we could be in for a lot of trouble? What does that mean?
Hagel: Officers resigning. When you start firing people from the outside, you’ll have officers and senior enlisted resign. You will lose the quality of the people who now serve. Our adversaries will see that. Our allies will see that. They will take from that a weakening of our military, a weakening of our military leadership, a weakening of our commitment by our military to a purpose much larger than their own self-interest. And that’s the United States of America’s security.
Karen Zamora adapted this interview for the web.
Transcript:
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
What does it take to run the Department of Defense? That is a question that’ll be at the heart of Pete Hegseth’s confirmation process early next year. Hegseth, longtime Fox News host, is President-elect Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense. The Department he’s nominated to run is one of the biggest, most complex entities in the U.S. – an institution that, as our next guest notes, has its own judicial code, its own legal system, its health care system.
Well, Chuck Hagel ran that institution. He served as secretary of defense from 2013 to 2015. Before that, he served a dozen years in the U.S. Senate as a Republican senator from Nebraska. Secretary Hagel, great to speak with you again.
CHUCK HAGEL: Oh, thank you.
KELLY: I want to start by letting you give us some sense of the span of things that would cross your desk as you tried to run it – the Defense Department.
HAGEL: Well, the way I explain that job – I led it. I didn’t run it. I led it. And I think that’s important because you have to work with and listen to so many different leaders within the institution – I mean, starting with the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and then each of the chiefs of the services. You’ve got the White House. You work with all the institutions in government. It’s a daily, early-in-the-morning-to-late-at-night effort. Unexpected – a lot of unexpected things come across your desk. You’re around the world. You know, I think in the two years I was secretary, I took around 27 international trips.
KELLY: Fair to say you are not describing an entry-level management job.
HAGEL: (Laughter) No. But, you know, those of us who had the privilege of leading the Pentagon had never had an experience quite like that, and really nobody has. But most of us who have led it have had some experience leading institutions in government and in the private sector.
KELLY: So I do want to turn you to the current moment and to President-elect Trump’s pick to lead the Pentagon. He is a Fox News host. He’s an Army veteran, National Guard. He has never run a big organization. Our Pentagon correspondent, Tom Bowman, who’s covered the Defense Department for many years, went back over the biographies of defense secretaries and secretaries of war, going back to the beginning of the Republic. He says, and I’m quoting, “without a doubt, Hegseth has the least experience.” What questions does that raise?
HAGEL: I think that is an issue, and I think the Senate confirmation process will bring that up. I mean, the confirmation process of these big jobs is so critically important. I think, though, it’s more than just experience. I mean, it’s the complete persona of who you are and what you bring to the job.
KELLY: So you wrote an essay for The New York Times last week, and the headline was, “Why I’m Worried About Our Military.” You write…
(Reading) Political independence and ethics are the bedrock of our military. Today, I’m concerned that both are in danger.
Secretary Hagel, why?
HAGEL: If the military is ever politicized in any way – and we’re seeing some indications from this incoming administration that it may be – for example, the warriors group – this group that President-elect Trump has talked about – evaluating generals and admirals, making decisions whether those people are qualified to lead the military or not or if they’ve made mistakes and then recommending to the president that he fire them – that’s politicizing the military. And the things that Mr. Hegseth’s said about the military, that does concern me in every way because, if you politicize the military, you politicize…
KELLY: May I ask what remarks are giving you pause?
HAGEL: Yes. For example, women should not be in combat. You know, we passed that marker a long time ago – this issue of diversity in the military.
KELLY: Just to put a point on this, Trump’s nominee, he has suggested he would look to remove senior officers that he sees as too woke. He has included the current chairman of the joint chiefs in that. My question to you – can he do that? I mean, just for people who don’t follow this closely, the chairman of the joint chiefs serves a four-year term. The current chair, CQ Brown, is only one year in.
HAGEL: Yes. Well, the president of the United States has the authority to fire any federal employee. He can do that. And this is another example of what I’m talking about. When you start talking about, well, firing the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, whose record is as impressive as any record we’ve seen – when you talk about firing him because of so-called woke, what do you mean by that? That’s what’s so dangerous here, and that’s why I’m so concerned. If, in fact, this administration follows through on these things, then we’re in for a lot of trouble.
KELLY: What – when you say we could be in for a lot of trouble – trouble like what? What does that mean?
HAGEL: Oh, officers resigning – when you start firing people from the outside, you’ll have officers and senior enlisted resign. You will lose the quality of the people who now serve. Our adversaries will see that. Our allies will see that. They will take from that a weakening of our military, a weakening of our military leadership, a weakening of our commitment by our military to a purpose much larger than their own self-interest – and that’s the United States of America’s security.
KELLY: To people who might look at the Defense Department and say, hey, maybe this institution is due for a shake-up – this is a military that fought two long, really expensive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as I don’t need to tell you, where objectives were not always clearly defined.
HAGEL: Well, that doesn’t come from the military. That comes from the political leadership of our country. It wasn’t the military. Our military serves the president as the leader and commander in chief of this country, with the acquiescence and the support of the Congress and the American people. But the military doesn’t make that decision.
KELLY: Former Defense Secretary and former Republican Senator Chuck Hagel. Secretary, thank you.
HAGEL: Thank you very much.
Party City files for bankruptcy and plans to shutter nationwide
Party City was once unmatched in its vast selection of affordable celebration goods. But over the years, competition stacked up at Walmart, Target, Spirit Halloween, and especially Amazon.
Sudan’s biggest refugee camp was already struck with famine. Now it’s being shelled
The siege, blamed on the Rapid Support Forces, has sparked a new humanitarian catastrophe and marks an alarming turning point in the Darfur region, already overrun by violence.
FDA approves weight loss drug Zepbound to treat obstructive sleep apnea
The FDA said studies have shown that by aiding weight loss, Zepbound improves sleep apnea symptoms in some patients.
Netflix is dreaming of a glitch-free Christmas with 2 major NFL games set
It comes weeks after Netflix's attempt to broadcast live boxing between Jake Paul and Mike Tyson was rife with technical glitches.
Opinion: The Pope wants priests to lighten up
A reflection on the comedy stylings of Pope Francis, who is telling priests to lighten up and not be so dour.
The FDA restricts a psychoactive mushroom used in some edibles
The Food and Drug Administration has told food manufacturers the psychoactive mushroom Amanita muscaria isn't authorized for food, including edibles, because it doesn't meet safety standards.
