Judge deliberates after Justice Department pushes to end corruption case against NYC Mayor Adams
Attorneys for the U.S. Justice Department and Mayor Eric Adams appeared before federal Judge Dale Ho Wednesday afternoon in Manhattan, pressing their case that five federal corruption and bribery charges against Adams should be suspended.
Normally such requests are granted readily when prosecutors and defendants are in agreement, but Ho asked a lengthy series of questions about the DOJ’s motives for putting Adams’ case on hold.
“This is a very complicated situation, at least from where I sit,” Ho said. At the end of the hearing, he declined to rule from the bench but said he would issue a ruling soon.
The DOJ moved last week to request that its sweeping criminal case against Adams, launched by the Justice Department under the Biden administration, be shelved.
Top Trump administration officials have signaled they expect Adams, a Democrat, to help the White House crack down on migrants living in New York City without legal status.
In the courtroom today, the DOJ’s acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove asserted repeatedly that Ho possessed only limited discretion to review the request for dismissal.
Bove, who once served as attorney for President Donald Trump, also said the decision to suspend the case was motivated in large part by “national security” concerns and a desire for Adams to pursue migrants in New York City who lack legal status.
Under questioning by Ho, Bove said canceling a criminal trial would allow Adams to “get back to work unburdened and unhindered.”
The DOJ’s dismissal memo, sent on Feb.10, said bluntly that a criminal trial would interfere with Adams’ ability to carry out one of the Trump administration’s key policies:
“[T]he pending prosecution has unduly restricted Mayor Adams’ ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime that escalated under the policies of the prior administration,” the DOJ’s memo asserted.
Critics say Adams case skewed by politics
Critics inside the DOJ suggested the decision to suspend the case came as part of an improper “quid pro quo.” At least seven Justice Department attorneys in New York City and Washington, D.C., resigned rather than go along with the deal.

Answering Ho’s questions under oath, however, Adams repeatedly said there was no explicit trade-off, linking his cooperation with the Trump administration on immigration enforcement in New York City to lenient treatment by the DOJ.
Ho also noted that the DOJ is reserving the right to indict Adams again on these charges in the future. Asked whether he felt threatened or pressured in any way, Adams answered, “No, your honor.”
Ho also noted in court that three former federal prosecutors filed a legal brief urging him to reject the DOJ’s bid to suspend the case against Adams. They argued that the move reflected improper political influence over a criminal case.
“Federal prosecutors should not make criminal charging decisions based on political associations, political activities, or personal allegiances,” they wrote.
During court proceedings on Wednesday, the DOJ’s Bove dismissed that claim as “partisan noise.”
Speaking with reporters before the hearing, Adams sounded upbeat, describing the proceedings as “part of the process.” In recent days, he’s made frequent public appearances throughout the city, promising progress on infrastructure, the economy and other priorities.
While Adams’ legal fate hangs on Ho’s ruling, his political future also hangs in the balance. Four of his deputy mayors resigned this week because of Adams’ scandals and his deepening ties to Trump’s immigration policies. Adams also faces a fiercely-contested Democratic primary in June followed by the general election in November.
Meanwhile, New York’s Democratic Governor Kathy Hochul, long considered a political ally of Adams, is weighing whether to use her authority to remove him from office.
Hochul met with top political and civic leaders on Tuesday in Manhattan to discuss Adams’ political future. She hasn’t yet announced her decision.
The controversial and obscure law being used against immigrant student protestors
The Trump Administration is using an obscure and controversial immigration law from 1952 to try to deport Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil.
What ELSE does the president want to make great again? Find out in the quiz!
This week was more than tariffs! There were tortoises, genetically engineered animals, smart vacuums and a lot of other news!
How DOGE may have improperly used Social Security data to push voter fraud narratives
A DOGE staffer working in the Social Security Administration has been pushing questionable claims about noncitizens voting — apparently using data that court records suggest DOGE shouldn't have.
Lightning strikes usually kill trees. This one just grows stronger
An author of a recent study about lightning's effect on trees in Panamanian forests says his team has gotten a large, positive response from people, including those who call the trees inspirational.
4 takeaways from the week: In a world that craves stability, Trump brings the chaos
President Trump's trade war sent global markets reeling this week. How Trump has handled tariffs shows the farthest thing from stability and predictability. A look at this and three other takeaways.
Beijing slaps 125% tariffs on U.S. goods in latest U.S.-China trade escalation
China signals the latest tariff hike will be its last round of tit-for-tat measures, prompting sharp falls in European shares, as Asian stocks end the day mixed.