‘Homegrowns are next:’ Trump hopes to deport and jail U.S. citizens abroad

President Trump says his administration is actively exploring a proposal to detain U.S. citizens and send them to prisons in El Salvador. Speaking Monday, minutes before a press briefing alongside El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, Trump could be heard embracing the concept.

“The homegrowns are next, the homegrowns. You’ve got to build about five more places,” Trump said to Bukele, an apparent reference to prison space that would be needed in El Salvador to house U.S. citizens.

El Salvador is already holding hundreds of people in a maximum-security prison, flown from the U.S. in recent weeks after being detained for allegedly lacking legal status or having gang affiliations.

Critics say many of those individuals were deported with limited or no due process, some in defiance of court orders by U.S. judges.

Responding to Trump on Monday, Bukele suggested his country is prepared to incarcerate American citizens. “Yeah, we’ve got space,” El Salvador’s president said.

The proposal has drawn condemnation from legal scholars across the political spectrum, who said it would represent an unprecedented encroachment on the civil liberties of U.S. citizens.

“It’s obviously unconstitutional, obviously illegal. There’s no authority in any U.S. law to deport U.S. citizens and certainly not to imprison them in a foreign country,” said David Bier at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank based in Washington, D.C.

“The problem of course is [Trump] already has illegally deported hundreds of people by just not giving the courts an opportunity to stop him,” Bier added. “I think that’s the real fear now that he is going to try to evade judicial review of deportations of U.S. citizens.”

“I’d do it in a heartbeat”

This isn’t the first time this idea has come up since Trump took office. Posting on the social media platform X in February, El Salvador’s Bukele said his country has “offered the United States of America the opportunity to outsource part of its prison system.”

“We are willing to take in only convicted criminals (including convicted U.S. citizens) into our mega-prison in exchange for a fee,” Bukele added, posting photographs of densely-packed inmates crouched with hands on their heads.

His post was amplified the same day by Trump ally Elon Musk, who described the proposal as a “Great idea!!” Speaking about the concept in February, Trump said: “I’d do it in a heartbeat.”

Asked again about the idea during Monday’s press conference, Trump confirmed he has ordered U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to explore whether it might be a legal and cost-effective way to house American prisoners.

Trump also suggested his administration might send U.S. citizens to be incarcerated in other countries.

“We have others we’re negotiating with, too,” he said. “If it’s a homegrown criminal, I have no problem. Now, we’re studying the laws right now, Pam is studying. If we can do that, it’s good.”

“Any of us is vulnerable to basically being kidnapped”

During an appearance Monday on the Fox News show Jessie Waters Primetime, Bondi seemed to embrace it: “These are Americans who he [President Trump] is saying who have committed the most heinous crimes in our country and crime is going to decrease dramatically.”

But numerous legal scholars contacted by NPR described the policy idea as crossing a bright line in the U.S. government’s treatment of American citizens.

“One hopes that the administration won’t go down this path,” said Lauren-Brooke Eisen, senior director of the Brennan Center‘s Justice Program, a progressive think-tank at New York University. “There are profound ethical questions that this move would signal about how we treat human beings who are U.S. citizens. Courts will almost certainly prevent this from happening.”

In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department in February, U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Democrat from Georgia, urged the Trump administration to abandon the idea.

Ossoff cited horrendous living conditions documented in Salvadoran prisons, where inmates often lack access to proper sanitation, temperature control and even potable water.

“It would be a moral and legal travesty for the U.S. government to subject anyone to such conditions,” Ossoff wrote.

The American Civil Liberties Union has also described the concept as a legal nonstarter:

“You may not deport a U.S. citizen, period,” ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the group’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, told NPR in February. “The courts have not allowed that, and they would not allow it.”

But during a White House press briefing April 8, spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt signaled the proposal is still being seriously considered: “The President has discussed this idea quite a few times publicly, he’s also discussed it privately,” she said.

“The President has said if it’s legal, right? If there is a legal pathway to do that, he’s not sure, we are not sure, it’s an idea he has simply floated and has discussed,” Leavitt added.

Some judges and legal scholars are clearly concerned the Trump administration could move forward with the proposal despite legal and constitutional barriers.

In an statement released last week, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Trump administration’s legal arguments around deportation cases suggest the U.S. government already believes it “could deport and incarcerate any person, including U.S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene.”

Speaking last week with NPR, Laurence Tribe, a Harvard professor emeritus of constitutional law, offered a similar warning:

“What that means is that literally any of us, whether we are from Venezuela or were born in the United States, whether we are immigrants or not, whether we are citizens or not, any of us is vulnerable to basically being kidnapped by masked agents of the United States government who don’t tell us why they’re picking us up, perhaps never to be seen again because we’re located somewhere in a dungeon, a prison cell, rotting away, whether it’s in El Salvador or anywhere else in the world,” Tribe said.

Conservatives on the sidelines

The U.S. has incarcerated American citizens before in ways that challenged or violated constitutional norms, including the internment of roughly 120,000 Japanese-Americans during World War II and the detention of Jose Padilla, an American citizen held for years without trial after being accused of terrorism activities in 2002.

But some legal experts interviewed for this story said deporting Americans to serve prison time in foreign countries would cross a bright line, effectively stripping U.S. citizens of constitutional and legal protections.

They noted that this proposal is also being explored by U.S. officials at a time when Trump has talked about “locking up” his political enemies, directing the Justice Department and the FBI to open criminal probes into opponents’ activities.

“We will expose and very much expose their egregious crimes and severe misconduct,” Trump said during a speech March 14 at DOJ headquarters.

Not everyone is voicing opposition to Trump’s concept of detaining American citizens and sending them overseas.

NPR contacted three prominent conservative legal scholars. All declined to comment. We also contacted three conservative legal think-tanks. One declined to comment, two others didn’t respond.

NPR could also find no instances of GOP lawmakers in the House or Senate commenting on the idea.

Bier, at the Cato Institute, said he has been “shocked” by the lack of pushback against Trump’s proposal from Republican leaders and members of the conservative legal movement.

“It’s unthinkable. It’s absolutely a reflection of where Donald Trump has taken the Republican Party and the conservative movement,” he said.