As judges block broad actions, White House says courts causing constitutional crisis
Since President Trump’s return to office last month, federal judges have notably halted several moves geared at drastically reforming parts of the federal government and U.S. immigration policy through a number of preliminary rulings and injunctions.
At least one federal judge has said the administration has failed to fully comply with a temporary restraining order in a case challenging the administration’s attempts to freeze payments for grants and other programs.
Critics of the administration have pointed to the various rulings as clear evidence that the president is overstepping his authority and thrusting the nation into a constitutional crisis.
But the White House is firing back, arguing that the real danger is coming from judges who have ruled against him.
“The real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch, where district court judges and liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump’s basic executive authority,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters during a briefing on Wednesday.
Leavitt called the orders that federal judges have made against the administration’s agenda a “continuation of the weaponization of justice” against Trump.
During Wednesday’s press briefing, Leavitt addressed what she characterized as “an extremely dishonest narrative” that the administration was causing a crisis with its actions and criticized the news media for “fear-mongering” on the topic.
Her comments came one day after Trump spoke about some of the legal challenges during remarks from the Oval Office, where he alleged that judges were seeking to thwart the administration’s agenda.
“We want to weed out the corruption, and it seems hard to believe that a judge could say, ‘we don’t want you to do that.’ So maybe we have to look at the judges, because that’s very serious. I think it’s a very serious violation,” Trump said.

Trump clarified that while he will comply with court rulings, the White House will also file appeals.
Leavitt acknowledged that while courts have the power to issue nationwide injunctions, “these judges have no basis in the law and have no grounds,” adding that Trump’s actions are constitutional and that the White House would be vindicated on appeal.
What does it take for a famine to be declared in Gaza?
Reports of starvation in Gaza raise the questions: Why the hesitation in labeling it a famine? And who are the authorities with the power to make that call?
Dear Life Kit: My friend says ugly things about her body and it makes me anxious
Body-acceptance advocate Katie Sturino and Ronald Young Jr., host of the podcast Weight for It, answer listener questions about body image, weight loss drugs and bullying.
Jeffrey Epstein files: Tracing the legal cases that led to sex-trafficking charges
Questions persist about how Jeffrey Epstein, who once moved among the world's elite, was able to avoid federal prosecution for so long. A timeline suggests some answers.
Singer Cleo Laine, who boasted a four-octave range, has died at 97
London's Sunday Times once called Laine "quite simply the best singer in the world."
‘Resurrection’ brings ‘Dexter’ back to life — and Michael C. Hall is better than ever
Featuring both old and new characters, Dexter: Resurrection has multiple murder investigations going on at once. The narrative is as interwoven and complex as a DNA strand — but somehow it all works.
‘Clueless’ just turned 30. A new anniversary glossary celebrates its language
A new glossary of the 1995 cult teen movie's most memorable expressions celebrates its 30th anniversary. Some have stood the test of time. Others not so much.