A weird partisan pattern of trust in the Fed

Recently, when President Trump threatened to fire Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, financial markets flipped out. Then Trump insisted he wasn’t going to fire Powell, but he still took time to criticize the Fed’s interest-rate policy under Powell’s leadership. Markets chilled out, a bit.

This confrontation between the president and America’s central bank inspired Planet Money to collaborate with its sister podcast The Indicator to make an episode that serves as a primer on the Federal Reserve. It explains why economists and investors tend to believe that an independent central bank — free of presidential meddling — is crucial to a stable, low-inflation economy. And it goes over a bit of the history of Trump’s antagonistic relationship with the Fed under Powell, a man Trump appointed to head the U.S. central bank in the first place.

As the episode explains, the Fed is supposed to be insulated from partisan politics. But a new study shows how partisan politics has long influenced how much faith Americans have in the Fed. And it’s not as simple as members of one political party trusting the Fed, and members of the other party distrusting it. American faith in the Fed has been more like a pendulum that swings with presidential elections: people have tended to trust the Fed more when their party’s leader sits in the White House. However, this study finds, after this most recent presidential election, the pendulum didn’t swing.

The old pendulum swing

In the study, economists Carola Binder (at University of Texas at Austin), Cody Couture (at Hamilton College), and Abhiprerna Smit (at William & Mary) look at partisan views of the Federal Reserve. They first analyze survey data from Gallup Poll and the Michigan Survey of Consumers between 2001 and 2023.

The economists find a clear pattern in this historical data: a huge predictor of whether respondents said they trusted the Fed was whether their political party controlled the White House.

For instance, if a respondent was a Democrat, they were more likely to express trust in the Federal Reserve when President Obama was in office. If a respondent was a Republican, they were more likely to express trust in the Fed when President Bush was in office (independents, meanwhile, tended to always be the most distrustful of the Fed, whether a Democrat or Republican was in office). This is a factor, the economists find, that is “much larger than any demographic differences.”

It’s kinda weird because the White House doesn’t call the shots at the Fed. The central bank has long been independent of the political branches in its day-to-day decision-making.

Importantly, this phenomenon of Americans expressing trust in the Fed when their political party controlled the White House was true during President Trump’s first term as well (even though, starting around 2019, President Trump began bashing Jerome Powell and the Fed’s interest-rate policies). Republicans tended to have higher trust in the Fed than Democrats, during his first term.

The economists wanted to see if anything has changed in President Trump’s second term. Would this pattern repeat itself? Republicans definitely distrusted the Fed more than Democrats during President’s Biden’s tenure. Would they, like they had in the past, begin trusting the Fed more than Democrats now that a Republican controlled the White House?

This time the pendulum didn’t swing

To answer this question and more, the economists conducted an online survey in early 2025 of more than 3,000 Americans. They did this survey in two waves, shortly before and then shortly after Trump’s inauguration.

The economists’ survey suggests that, actually, this time is different. Republicans expressed lower trust in the Fed than Democrats did (and independents are in the middle, between Democrats and Republicans, in how much they trust the Fed).

The economists offer a couple of potential explanations. One is that the explosion of inflation that began in 2021 “caused a persistent erosion of Fed credibility among Republicans.” Another explanation: Republicans have become “more skeptical of technocracy” – or, Deep-State experts, if you will – “regardless of who controls the Presidency.” Maybe a simpler explanation is that, with Trump publicly bashing Powell and the Fed in the media, his supporters now consider the Fed, under Powell, as being antagonistic to their political tribe.

Binder, Couture, and Smit have another kinda weird finding: Despite Republicans expressing less faith in the Federal Reserve, they were also significantly more likely to believe that inflation will be lower in the future. It’s weird because the Federal Reserve’s biggest job is managing inflation. So many Republican respondents were like, nah, we don’t trust the Fed. But also, inflation is going to go significantly down.

The economists’ survey did offer respondents space to write why they believed what they believed. And — despite the potential inflationary impact of Trump’s tariffs and immigration crackdown — Republican respondents often gave answers that suggested they believed Trump would single-handedly bring down inflation through, for example, business deregulation or greater energy production.

Democrats, meanwhile, expressed the highest faith in the Fed. Yet they were more likely to express fears about inflation. Many of them tended to cite tariffs as a reason why they believed inflation would get worse. Many others just said basically, because, you know, Trump.

Some of these economists’ findings may be a bit puzzling to those who closely watch the Fed. But maybe it becomes less puzzling when you realize: many Americans don’t really understand what the Fed is or what it does! They probably just take their cues from the leader of their political tribe. And, for the first time in decades, the president has been sending a strong signal that the Fed is not doing what he wants.

 

This historian dug up the hidden history of ‘amateur’ blackface in America

In her new book, Darkology, historian Rhae Lynn Barnes writes about how blackface and minstrel shows became one of the most popular forms of entertainment in 19th- and 20th-century America.

Attempted attack with explosives in New York City investigated as “ISIS-inspired terrorism”

New York City NYPD Commissioner: "Explosive devices that could have caused serious injury or death."

Trump is using immigration policy to suppress speech, lawsuit claims

A new lawsuit accuses the administration of violating the First Amendment by threatening the visas of researchers for work on disinformation and content moderation of social media.

Why young girls are disguised as boys in Afghanistan

The Taliban has released a video of an interrogation of a girl who passed as a boy. It's an age-old practice in this patriarchal society but now appears to be happening with some frequency.

Live Nation and Justice Department reach settlement in antitrust case

The trial, which began a week ago in a New York City courtroom, aimed to break up Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster.

Microshelters for Birmingham’s unhoused set to open soon

The pilot program called Home For All involves building 14 small pallet homes to house those who would otherwise be living on the streets.

More Front Page Coverage