Alabama Supreme Court Causes Marriage License Confusion

 ========= Old Image Removed =========Array
(
    [_wp_attached_file] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg
        )

    [_wp_attachment_metadata] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:5:{s:5:"width";i:640;s:6:"height";i:360;s:4:"file";s:30:"2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg";s:5:"sizes";a:9:{s:6:"medium";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-336x189.jpg";s:5:"width";i:336;s:6:"height";i:189;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-140x140.jpg";s:5:"width";i:140;s:6:"height";i:140;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"wbhm-icon";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:28:"alabama-courthouse-80x80.jpg";s:5:"width";i:80;s:6:"height";i:80;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:20:"wbhm-featured-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:18:"wbhm-featured-home";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-553x311.jpg";s:5:"width";i:553;s:6:"height";i:311;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:22:"wbhm-featured-carousel";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-470x265.jpg";s:5:"width";i:470;s:6:"height";i:265;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:28:"ab-block-post-grid-landscape";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:25:"ab-block-post-grid-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:14:"post-thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-125x125.jpg";s:5:"width";i:125;s:6:"height";i:125;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}}s:10:"image_meta";a:12:{s:8:"aperture";s:1:"0";s:6:"credit";s:0:"";s:6:"camera";s:0:"";s:7:"caption";s:0:"";s:17:"created_timestamp";s:1:"0";s:9:"copyright";s:0:"";s:12:"focal_length";s:1:"0";s:3:"iso";s:1:"0";s:13:"shutter_speed";s:1:"0";s:5:"title";s:0:"";s:11:"orientation";s:1:"0";s:8:"keywords";a:0:{}}}
        )

    [_imagify_data] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:2:{s:5:"stats";a:3:{s:13:"original_size";i:0;s:14:"optimized_size";i:0;s:7:"percent";i:0;}s:5:"sizes";a:1:{s:4:"full";a:2:{s:7:"success";b:0;s:5:"error";s:77:"WELL DONE. This image is already compressed, no further compression required.";}}}
        )

    [_imagify_status] => Array
        (
            [0] => already_optimized
        )

    [_imagify_optimization_level] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

)
1658047791 
1435600561

In an order released Monday, the Alabama Supreme Court is inviting parties to submit briefs “addressing the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision” in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Many lawyers and other experts first interpreted the order as a 25-day buffer period before Alabama probate judges would have to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, further analysis concluded that the order does not include any directions for probate judges.

John Carroll, former U.S. Magistrate Judge and Samford law professor, says the order gives probate judges some temporary power.

“It meant that the probate judges don’t have to issue the licenses [to same-sex couples],” he says, “but they can if they want to.”

Carroll says it’s unclear whether the 25-day buffer period still stands, and the Alabama Supreme Court will have to give further direction before anything will change.

“I think the court’s going to have to issue another order,” he says, “or I think probate judges will continue doing what’s going on now– which is some are issuing licenses and some aren’t.”

An Associated Press telephone survey of counties on Monday found that nearly half of Alabama’s counties (at least 32 of the state’s 67 counties) were issuing the licenses to gay couples.

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore agreed with Carroll’s assessment. “What the order means is that within that 25-day period no [probate judge] has to issue a marriage license to a same sex couple,” Moore told al.com.

Why 25 days?

“Every appellate court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has a period of time after they rule for the parties to seek rehearing,” says Carroll.

According to U.S. Supreme Court Rule 44 , “Any petition for the rehearing of any judgment or decision of the Court on the merits shall be filed within 25 days after entry of the judgment or decision.”

“If the court doesn’t grant rehearing in 25 days, then the order is in deed final,” says Carroll. “No one, quite frankly, expects the ruling of the Supreme Court to be altered in any shape or form.”

No More Licenses

Several Alabama counties, like Pike County, have shut down marriage license operations altogether.

Reporting for NPR, Troy Public Radio’s Kyle Gassiott says “marriage licenses haven’t been issued (in Pike County) to gay or straight couples since February, in protest of an earlier court decision that briefly legalized gay marriage in the state.” On Friday, Pike County Probate Judge Wes Allen released a statement saying he believes the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped its authority and that Pike County would no long issue marriage licenses to anyone.

Additional reporting provided by the Associated Press. Updated Tuesday, June 30 with additional information on U.S. Supreme Court rehearing rules. 

 

Senate approves cuts to NPR, PBS and foreign aid programs

The Senate voted to approve a $9 billion rescission package aimed at clawing back money already allocated for public radio and television.

Gulf Coast braces for flooding as storm builds into possible tropical depression

The weather system moving across the Florida Panhandle on Wednesday was showing a greater chance of becoming a tropical depression as it moves toward the northern Gulf Coast.

White House says U.S. fentanyl overdose programs will be funded ‘in increments’

CDC staffers worry $140 million in grants could fail to reach state and local overdose programs. The White House officials say the dollars will arrive but won't say when.

Thousands of veterans get help from Congress to save their homes from foreclosure

A bipartisan Congress has come to the rescue of vets at risk of losing their homes, after administrations from both parties tore up VA safety nets for homeowners.

Clawing back foreign aid is tied to ‘waste, fraud and abuse.’ What’s the evidence?

As the Senate prepares to vote on a bill to rescind $40 billion in promised foreign aid, critics of the measure say a thorough governmental review of targeted programs did not actually take place.

How a third parent’s DNA can prevent an inherited disease

An experimental technique that patches defective DNA with donated genetic material helped families at risk of passing rare illnesses to their children.

More Front Page Coverage