Alabama Supreme Court Causes Marriage License Confusion

 ========= Old Image Removed =========Array
(
    [_wp_attached_file] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg
        )

    [_wp_attachment_metadata] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:5:{s:5:"width";i:640;s:6:"height";i:360;s:4:"file";s:30:"2010/05/alabama-courthouse.jpg";s:5:"sizes";a:9:{s:6:"medium";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-336x189.jpg";s:5:"width";i:336;s:6:"height";i:189;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-140x140.jpg";s:5:"width";i:140;s:6:"height";i:140;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:9:"wbhm-icon";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:28:"alabama-courthouse-80x80.jpg";s:5:"width";i:80;s:6:"height";i:80;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:20:"wbhm-featured-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:18:"wbhm-featured-home";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-553x311.jpg";s:5:"width";i:553;s:6:"height";i:311;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:22:"wbhm-featured-carousel";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-470x265.jpg";s:5:"width";i:470;s:6:"height";i:265;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:28:"ab-block-post-grid-landscape";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:25:"ab-block-post-grid-square";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-600x360.jpg";s:5:"width";i:600;s:6:"height";i:360;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}s:14:"post-thumbnail";a:4:{s:4:"file";s:30:"alabama-courthouse-125x125.jpg";s:5:"width";i:125;s:6:"height";i:125;s:9:"mime-type";s:10:"image/jpeg";}}s:10:"image_meta";a:12:{s:8:"aperture";s:1:"0";s:6:"credit";s:0:"";s:6:"camera";s:0:"";s:7:"caption";s:0:"";s:17:"created_timestamp";s:1:"0";s:9:"copyright";s:0:"";s:12:"focal_length";s:1:"0";s:3:"iso";s:1:"0";s:13:"shutter_speed";s:1:"0";s:5:"title";s:0:"";s:11:"orientation";s:1:"0";s:8:"keywords";a:0:{}}}
        )

    [_imagify_data] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:2:{s:5:"stats";a:3:{s:13:"original_size";i:0;s:14:"optimized_size";i:0;s:7:"percent";i:0;}s:5:"sizes";a:1:{s:4:"full";a:2:{s:7:"success";b:0;s:5:"error";s:77:"WELL DONE. This image is already compressed, no further compression required.";}}}
        )

    [_imagify_status] => Array
        (
            [0] => already_optimized
        )

    [_imagify_optimization_level] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

)
1657327862 
1435600561

In an order released Monday, the Alabama Supreme Court is inviting parties to submit briefs “addressing the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision” in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Many lawyers and other experts first interpreted the order as a 25-day buffer period before Alabama probate judges would have to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, further analysis concluded that the order does not include any directions for probate judges.

John Carroll, former U.S. Magistrate Judge and Samford law professor, says the order gives probate judges some temporary power.

“It meant that the probate judges don’t have to issue the licenses [to same-sex couples],” he says, “but they can if they want to.”

Carroll says it’s unclear whether the 25-day buffer period still stands, and the Alabama Supreme Court will have to give further direction before anything will change.

“I think the court’s going to have to issue another order,” he says, “or I think probate judges will continue doing what’s going on now– which is some are issuing licenses and some aren’t.”

An Associated Press telephone survey of counties on Monday found that nearly half of Alabama’s counties (at least 32 of the state’s 67 counties) were issuing the licenses to gay couples.

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore agreed with Carroll’s assessment. “What the order means is that within that 25-day period no [probate judge] has to issue a marriage license to a same sex couple,” Moore told al.com.

Why 25 days?

“Every appellate court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has a period of time after they rule for the parties to seek rehearing,” says Carroll.

According to U.S. Supreme Court Rule 44 , “Any petition for the rehearing of any judgment or decision of the Court on the merits shall be filed within 25 days after entry of the judgment or decision.”

“If the court doesn’t grant rehearing in 25 days, then the order is in deed final,” says Carroll. “No one, quite frankly, expects the ruling of the Supreme Court to be altered in any shape or form.”

No More Licenses

Several Alabama counties, like Pike County, have shut down marriage license operations altogether.

Reporting for NPR, Troy Public Radio’s Kyle Gassiott says “marriage licenses haven’t been issued (in Pike County) to gay or straight couples since February, in protest of an earlier court decision that briefly legalized gay marriage in the state.” On Friday, Pike County Probate Judge Wes Allen released a statement saying he believes the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped its authority and that Pike County would no long issue marriage licenses to anyone.

Additional reporting provided by the Associated Press. Updated Tuesday, June 30 with additional information on U.S. Supreme Court rehearing rules. 

 

Supreme Court allows Trump to resume mass federal layoffs for now

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was appointed to the court by President Biden, dissented.

Graphics: Where the Texas floods happened and how high the waters rose

One Guadalupe River gauge near Kerrville and Camp Mystic recorded a rise of more than 25 feet in two hours.

Haiti’s iconic Hotel Oloffson, long a cultural beacon, destroyed by gang violence

The Hotel Oloffson in Haiti's capital Port-au-Prince, long a haven for artists and writers, poets and presidents, a symbol of Haiti's troubled politics and its storied past, has been destroyed by gangs.

New books this week focus on Caitlin Clark, King Tut, and how ‘Democrats Lost America’

Plus: a new novel from Gary Shteyngart, a true story of a shipwreck, and a memoir from a wrongly incarcerated inmate who was exonerated after 28 years behind bars.

Shoes off at the airport? TSA appears to be giving the pesky rule the boot

For nearly twenty years, most air travelers in the U.S. have been required to remove their shoes when going through security. That requirement seems to be ending.

Texas flood recovery efforts face tough conditions as local officials face hard questions

Emergency responders kept hope alive as they combed through fallen trees and other debris that littered the hard-hit central Texas communities on the fifth day after devastating floods killed more than 100.

More Front Page Coverage