Open Meetings Law
Jefferson County Commissioners will meet tomorrow to determine their next move as the county struggles with more than three billion dollars of sewer debt. They could reach a settlement with creditors or file what would be the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history. But they’ll hold the meeting in executive session. That means meeting with lawyers, behind closed doors. And as WBHM’s Andrew Yeager reports that has some questioning if they’re violating Alabama’s open meetings law.
A week ago Jefferson County Commissioners met in executive session for more than four hours. When they emerged, the media gaggle of cameras and microphones enveloped commission president David Carrington. He briefly explained that Governor Robert Bentley asked commissioners to continue negotiating with creditors.
“Then we agreed with the governor to give it another eight days but we also agreed that August the 12th was the date.”
Phrases such as “we agreed” suggests they could be breaking Alabama’s open meetings law. Such laws are designed so the public can see what elected officials are doing on their behalf. Dennis Bailey is general council for the Alabama Press Association and helped write the statute. He says it’s pretty clear. Executive sessions protect conversations under what you might think of as the commission’s attorney/client privilege.
“What do you recommend Mr. Attorney or Ms. Attorney? What do you think we ought to respond? What are our options? Can we do this? Can we do that? If that’s what’s going on between the board members and the attorney that’s okay to be done in executive session.”
Bailey says that changes when the commissioners start talking among themselves.
“Where they want to say ‘I don’t think we should do “X.” I think we should do “Y.”‘ And they’re talking to the commissioners that sit with them. That’s when they cross the line. That kind of discussion needs to be in the open.”
Bailey says phrases indicating agreement among commissioners, as well as a report in Wednesday’s Birmingham News with details of a proposed settlement from the county, is circumstantial evidence of an open meetings violation.
Jimmie Stephens is finance chair of the Jefferson County Commission. He says they’ve done nothing wrong.
“There was no deliberations made during that meeting. It was purely informational.”
Stephens says they made no decision. They took no action. Continuing negotiations just continues the status quo. Stephens says he has opinions about bankruptcy and settlement, but they are his. Not the commissions’.
“We do not have a collective thought until our meeting on Friday. All collective decisions are gonna be made in a public meeting.”
Alabama Ethics Commission Director Jim Sumner says the state attorney general would have to issue any opinion on whether the commission is breaking the state open meetings law. But Sumner thinks they might be. A spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office declined to comment, but says she knows of no complains the office has received related to the Jefferson County sewer meetings.
Commissioner Jimmie Stephens says even if the county decides to settle on Friday, that wouldn’t be the end. They would still have to hammer out line-by-line specifics of the solution. Stephens says that’s when public input would come.
“We plan on having a public hearing and a public forum to discuss whether we will proceed or not.”
He says those details would go into a final legal settlement for approval in an open meeting.
Regardless of Friday’s decision, the closed doors leave some critics uneasy. After all, secret meetings and backroom deals contributed to Jefferson County’s financial crisis in the first place.
How flood sirens could have saved lives in Texas
In the wake of the deadly flash floods in Texas, state leaders are exploring whether to install more flood warning sirens. Such sirens can save lives if they're part of a larger warning system.
Trump got his tax bill over the finish line. Now he has to sell it to voters
The 900-page tax and policy package fulfills several key campaign promises but also makes cuts that could boot millions from health care and food assistance programs.
As Democrats spoil for a fight, a new face in the House is leading them on oversight
Rep. Robert Garcia is the new top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee. At a moment when his party is craving more confrontation with President Trump, he says he's ready to lean into the fray.
What Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act means for taxes on Social Security
Many Americans received an email from the Social Security Administration applauding the megabill's passage. Experts say it was misleading.
What AI bot started referring to itself as ‘MechaHitler’? Find out in the quiz
Elon Musk and his AI have been busy. So has the TSA. And Amazon. Were you paying attention?
European allies step up plans for Ukraine stabilization, with U.S. attending meeting
The force is expected to provide logistical and training experts to help reconstitute Ukraine's armed forces, secure Ukraine's skies and the Black Sea.