What Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act means for taxes on Social Security
In the hours after Congress passed President Trump’s megabill, an email from the Social Security Administration hit the inboxes of many Americans. It applauded the legislation’s passage and said it includes a provision that “eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries.”
But experts say the email was misleading and that what’s really in the new law is a bit more complicated.
What’s in the new law?
Trump campaigned on the promise of “no tax on Social Security benefits.” But the new law doesn’t create a special exemption for taxes on Social Security benefits. Instead, it adds a new tax deduction for people 65 and older — and that means more of them will pay no taxes, or fewer taxes, on their Social Security benefits.
“The legislation that passed does make it so some people won’t pay taxes on their benefits,” says Marc Goldwein, senior vice president at the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “The reason is that it’ll make it so that some seniors won’t pay any taxes, because it increases their standard deduction.”
The new senior deduction is $6,000 a year for individuals 65 or older.
About that email — and why it’s controversial
On July 3, the Social Security Administration blasted out an email with the subject line “Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors.”
The agency is not in the practice of sending political emails, so this was notable.
But that wasn’t the only issue, says Howard Gleckman, senior fellow at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
“The email was really pretty misleading. It included a number of assertions that simply are either not true or overstated or described in a way that is really going to confuse people,” says Gleckman.
First, the email implies that the bill changed how Social Security benefits are taxed — and the White House put out a news release headlined “No Tax on Social Security is a Reality in the One Big Beautiful Bill.”
But Social Security benefits are taxed like other income, and this law doesn’t change that.
Second, the email says, “the bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits.”
Indeed, the White House Council of Economic Advisers estimates that, under the new law, 88% of older adults receiving Social Security benefits will pay no taxes on them.
But Gleckman points out that by the administration’s own estimate, almost two-thirds of Social Security recipients already don’t pay taxes on their benefits, because they don’t make enough money for that tax to kick in.
NPR reached out to the Social Security Administration for a response to these critiques but did not hear back. In a news release with similar text to the email, the administration posted a correction that removes the language stating that the $6,000 annual deduction for older adults is in addition to another separate policy change.
Who will see a lower tax bill with this deduction?
It’s primarily middle- or upper-middle-class folks who will see a difference with the new senior deduction, says Gleckman. He and his colleagues at the Tax Policy Center estimate that about half of older adults will benefit.
Those who’ll see the biggest benefit are those with incomes between $80,000 and $130,000. They should receive an average tax cut of about $1,100.
Lower-income seniors won’t notice any change from this deduction, because they already earn too little to pay taxes. And higher-income folks won’t see a change, because individuals with incomes over $175,000 or couples over $250,000 won’t qualify for the new deduction.
The impact of the tax cuts on Social Security itself
The email quotes Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano: “This legislation reaffirms President Trump’s promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they’ve earned.”
But that depends on what you mean by “protect.”
Taxes paid on Social Security benefits go directly to shoring up the trust funds for Social Security and Medicare Part A. Cutting these taxes accelerates the timeline in which those trust funds will become insolvent.
According to an estimate from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, that will now happen in late 2032. It estimates that Social Security benefits would be cut by an estimated 24% unless Congress makes changes before then.
In that way, cutting taxes that feed the trust fund does the opposite of protecting Social Security.
Auburn fires coach Hugh Freeze following 12th loss in his last 15 SEC games
The 56-year-old Freeze failed to fix Auburn’s offensive issues in three years on the Plains, scoring 24 or fewer points in 17 of his 22 league games. He also ended up on the wrong end of too many close matchups, including twice this season thanks partly to questionable calls.
In a ‘disheartening’ era, the nation’s former top mining regulator speaks out
Joe Pizarchik, who led the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement from 2009 to 2017, says Alabama’s move in the wake of a fatal 2024 home explosion increases risks to residents living atop “gassy” coal mines.
‘It’s like feeling the arms of your creator just wrapped around you’: a visit to a special healing Shabbat
Members of Temple Emanu-El in Birmingham gathered recently for their traditional Friday Shabbat service. But this particular service was different, as could be seen by all the people dressed in their finest pink.
Space Command is coming to Huntsville. What might that mean for first-time homebuyers
While Huntsville has been a more affordable market than other growing cities, what’s it been like for those looking for their first home?
Colorado says relocation of Space Command to Alabama is ‘punishment’ for mail-in voting
The litigation announced by Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser asks a federal judge to block the move as unconstitutional.
Breaking down Alabama’s CHOOSE Act
It’s been a year since Alabama legislators passed the CHOOSE Act allowing families to apply for state funds to use towards homeschool expenses and tuition for participating private schools. The Alabama Daily News’ education reporter Trisha Powell Crain has been diving into how the funds are being used. WBHM’s Andrew Gelderman sat down with her to talk about what we’re seeing so far.

