U.S. withdraws from U.N. cultural agency over ‘divisive social and cultural causes’
The Trump administration will withdraw the U.S. from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) — about two years after the U.S. rejoined the group under Biden.
The agency focuses on promoting international collaboration in education, science and culture. It’s best known for its list of World Heritage sites, which acknowledge places with cultural or natural significance.
On Tuesday, U.S. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement that involvement in UNESCO is “not in the national interest of the United States,” accusing the U.N. agency of advancing “divisive social and cultural causes.”
Audrey Azoulay, UNESCO’s director general, said the decision was disappointing but anticipated. According to Azoulay, the withdrawal will take effect at the end of 2026.
“This decision contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism, and may affect first and foremost our many partners in the United States of America — communities seeking site inscription on the World Heritage List, Creative City status, and University Chairs,” Azoulay said in a press release.
UNESCO has 194 member states and oversees more than 1,200 World Heritage sites — 26 of which are located in the U.S., including the Statue of Liberty, Yosemite National Park and Grand Canyon National Park. Sites that are added to the World Heritage list gain access to international funding to help with protection and conservation.
Among the reasons Bruce gave for the decision to withdraw from UNESCO, were the organization’s “outsized focus” on the U.N.’s sustainable development goals, which include fighting poverty and hunger, as well as promoting gender equality and clean energy.
She called the goals a “globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy.”
Bruce said the Trump administration also took issue with UNESCO’s move to admit the state of Palestine as a member back in 2011.
“UNESCO’s decision to admit the ‘State of Palestine’ as a Member State is highly problematic, contrary to U.S. policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization,” she said.
This is not the first time that the Trump administration has pulled out of UNESCO — it did so during President Trump’s first term in 2018 over similar concerns about anti-Israel bias at the U.N. agency.
Five years later, in 2023, the Biden administration rejoined UNESCO and announced plans to pay over $600 million in back dues.
UNESCO’s decision to include Palestine as a member has sparked debate for years. In 2011, the Obama administration similarly objected to the decision and cut funding to the organization.
NPR’s Michele Kelemen contributed reporting.
Boo to spooky chocolate prices! It’s the year of chewy, fruity Halloween treats
Sales of non-chocolate candy are growing faster than those of chocolate. With cocoa in shortage, manufacturers are changing pack sizes, adding fillers and dipping candy in "white creme."
This is not your grandmother’s ‘Hedda’
Tessa Thompson schemes, manipulates and awes in Nia DaCosta's dazzling adaptation of Hedda Gabler.
It’s supposed to be payday for many federal workers. Instead, they’re getting nothing
Roughly 1.4 million federal workers are going without pay due to the government shutdown. About half of them are furloughed, while the other half has been deemed essential and is working without pay.
No historic museums were harmed in the making of this quiz. Can you score 11?
From brazen jewel heists to internet meltdowns, this week brought travesties galore.
Not sure how to support a friend with cancer? Survivors have advice
To help a loved one with cancer, think about what you're good at — and what they need. Are you organized? Plan their meals. Detail-oriented? Go with them to appointments. Survivors share ideas.
As strikes on alleged drug boats grow, so do questions about their legality and goal
President Trump says he has authority to carry out the strikes, but international experts are asking if the attacks are truly about countering narcotics or instead toppling Venezuela's Nicolás Maduro.
