Trump takes birthright citizenship to the Supreme Court

The Trump administration is taking its fight to nullify birthright citizenship to the U.S. Supreme Court. To date, every court to have considered Trump’s executive order, issued on day one of his administration, has blocked it. But he is persisting.

President Trump’s contention that birthright citizenship is unconstitutional is widely considered a fringe view because the Supreme Court ruled to the contrary 127 years ago, and that decision has never been disturbed.

Indeed, the 14th amendment says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.” Trump, however, has long argued that there is no such thing as automatic citizenship, at least not for all children born in the U.S.

Already, three federal judges in three different states have blocked Trump’s executive order voiding birthright citizenship, and three separate appeals courts have refused to unblock those court orders. Judge John Coughenour, a Reagan appointee in Washington state, was the first judge to block Trump’s executive order, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

But Thursday, in three separate — but nearly identical — filings, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to narrow the lower court orders, which apply nationwide, so that the administration could begin planning to put into effect its new policy against birthright citizenship.

Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired immigration law professor at Cornell and the co-author of a widely used treatise on immigration, said the court might well be willing to grant that temporary narrowing request. But he added, “I think that would cause chaos and confusion as to who was included in the court rulings and who is potentially subject to the birthright citizenship ban if the case goes in favor of the Trump administration on the merits.”

Interestingly, the Trump administration’s Supreme Court filing spends far more time on the power of lower court judges to issue nationwide injunctions, as in this case, than it does on the question of birthright citizenship. That may be because some of the Court’s justices have often complained about such nationwide rulings, and rather than deal with the birthright citizenship question, where the administration faces an uphill battle, it may think it has a better shot with a frontal attack on nationwide injunctions.

“At the very least, they have an indication that they have a better chance on the injunction question than on the [constitutional question] of birthright citizenship,” said Ilya Somin, a professor at Antonin Scalia Law School.

That said, Republican-run states made wide use of nationwide injunctions when they were attacking Biden and Obama administration policies, and the Supreme Court didn’t intervene then. The middle ground, says Professor Yale-Loehr, might be for the Supreme Court to allow the Trump administration to at least begin its plans to obliterate birthright citizenship.

“The Supreme Court may well limit the injunctions partially, maybe not to the extent that the Trump Administration wants, but [to the extent] that will allow the Trump administration to claim a political victory.”

Before any ruling, though, the justices will ask for a response from the other side.

 

GOP blames government shutdown on health care for undocumented people. That’s false

The White House and GOP lawmakers say a provision in the Big Beautiful Bill that Democrats want rolled back keeps undocumented people from getting health benefits — a claim experts say is misleading.

Take a look! ‘Reading Rainbow’ is back

Mychal Threets, a social media star librarian, is hosting the new iteration of the series. It's back for four episodes starting on Saturday.

Trump gives Hamas a ‘last chance’ deadline to agree to a peace plan with Israel

President Trump said that if Hamas does not agree to the 20-point plan, as presented by Israel and the U.S., then "all HELL, like no one has ever seen before, will break out against Hamas."

8 takeaways from Taylor Swift’s new album, ‘The Life of a Showgirl’

Swift's 12th studio album returns to her pop roots, with lots of love-struck lyrics and upbeat melodies. But it's also a warning about the darker side of an industry she has battled — and bested.

‘The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny’ is a terrific, tangled love story

This is an epic novel to be savored. At nearly 700 pages, this multi-character, multi-stranded story explores exile and displacement — not only from one's home, but also from one's own sense of self.

Mexico: The cumbia DJs of the streets

One of the most listened-to genres in the Americas, photographers and storytellers Karla Gachet and Ivan Kashinsky document cumbia in Colombia, Mexico, Ecuador, Peru, Argentina and the United States.

More Front Page Coverage