Supreme Court press corps asks chief justice to live-stream court’s opinions
Members of the Supreme Court press corps released a public letter Wednesday asking that the audio of the court’s opinions and oral dissents be streamed online. The letter was originally sent to Chief Justice John Roberts privately one year ago, and has not received a response.
The signatories were representatives from all the major radio and TV networks as well as the newspaper and news agencies that cover the court, including NPR.
As it stands now, over the coming days as the U.S. Supreme Court announces a variety of highly significant decisions from the bench, only the lawyers, public attendees and members of the press corps who happen to be in the courtroom will hear directly from the justice of the opinion as he or she reads a summary of the decision.
The audio of that announcement will not be available until the next term begins in the fall, when it can be listened to at the National Archives or on the Oyez website.
The letter notes that the court began providing live audio of oral arguments in 2020 when the pandemic prevented the justices from hearing oral arguments together. Until then the court had resisted broadcasting oral arguments except in very rare cases, such as Bush v. Gore, the case that decided the 2000 election. But after the pandemic subsided and normal arguments resumed, the court continued the practice of live-streaming oral arguments — though continued to bar live streaming of opinion announcements.
The letter argues that while the justices would like people to read their opinions in their entirety for themselves, most people will not devote the hours needed to do that. It goes on to say that “in this era of misinformation, providing live audio of opinion announcements would allow the Court to speak directly to the American people on issues of extraordinary importance.”
It concludes that “just as the Court’s live streaming of oral arguments has made your work accessible to a much wider audience, taking the next stop to allow the court’s opinion announcements to be heard in real time will lead to greater understanding and appreciation of the court’s final decisions.”
How did Condé Nast go from dominance to decline? A new book explains
For decades, Condé Nast publications such as Vogue and Vanity Fair were consequential tastemakers. Writer Michael Grynbaum explores the heyday of these magazines and how they lost their footing.
1960s pop star Connie Francis has died. The singer’s life was touched by tragedies
1960s pop star Connie Francis has died. The first female singer to chart a number-one single on the Billboard Hot 100, she sold over 40 million records before the age of 25.
Marc Maron on why it’s time for his ‘WTF’ podcast to end
Marc Maron is proud of his run as host of his podcast, WTF. And because of that, he's bringing it to a close. He wants to avoid it becoming just another show "feeding the garbage bin of content."
Virginia is for … data centers? Residents are increasingly saying no
The world's highest concentration of data centers is in Virginia. Many residents are not happy about that.
Senate approves cuts to NPR, PBS and foreign aid programs
The Senate voted to approve a $9 billion rescission package aimed at clawing back money already allocated for public radio and television.
Gulf Coast braces for flooding as storm builds into possible tropical depression
The weather system moving across the Florida Panhandle on Wednesday was showing a greater chance of becoming a tropical depression as it moves toward the northern Gulf Coast.
