Supreme Court allows NIH to stop making nearly $800M in research grants for now
The Supreme Court on Thursday overturned by a 5-4 decision a lower court order, deciding at least temporarily, that the National Institute of Health does not need to continue paying out approximately $783 million in research grants to projects that the institute has since-stopped funding.
But the court, in its emergency docket order, also left in place by a 5-4 order a lower court ruling that threw out NIH memos that enforced the administration’s policies.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the court’s conservatives save Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with the court’s three liberals.
In February, the NIH, the “largest public funder of biomedical research in the world,” began terminating federal grants en masse for projects that did not “align with” the Trump administration’s policies.
In what the ACLU has referred to as “an ideological purge,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, instructed a re-evaluation of all grants funding or supporting “DEI and gender identity research activities and programs.” Funding was also withdrawn from projects studying “vaccine hesitancy” and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, projects that the NIH asserts have “outlasted” their “limited purpose.”
The NIH leaders argue that “awards can be terminated if they do not support agency objectives or policies” as noted in the NIH’s Notice of Award Stipulations. They compared this case to an April Supreme Court emergency docket decision where the justices allowed the administration to freeze $65 million worth of Department of Education DEI-related grants while the case proceeded in the lower courts.
Sixteen states, as well as advocacy organizations, and researchers disagreed—they sued the NIH and Kennedy, arguing that terminating the research grants was unconstitutional.
A federal district court judge concluded that the terminations were based on “no reasoned decision-making” and, after a bench trial, temporarily reinstated the grants. In his decision, Judge William Young, criticized the NIH for breaking “a historical norm of a largely apolitical scientific research agency.” The First Circuit Court of Appeals refused to intervene in the lower court’s temporary decision.
But on Thursday, the Supreme Court blocked the district court’s order, allowing the Trump administration to pause paying out grants to researchers as this case proceeds in the lower courts.
The costs of Israel’s longest war, for Israelis
Israelis are paying heavy costs for the longest war in their history: a mental health crisis, trauma, unprecedented division during wartime, animosity abroad and apathy for Palestinian suffering.
These numbers show how 2 years of war have devastated Palestinian lives in Gaza
It's been two years since Hamas-led militants attacked Israel, killing some 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. In response, Israeli leaders promised a punishing offensive. Here are some numbers showing the war's toll.
White House floats no back pay for some furloughed federal workers despite 2019 law
A new draft White House memo suggests a 2019 law signed by President Trump that guarantees federal employees get paid after a shutdown ends would not apply to furloughed workers.
The government shutdown is snarling air travel. Officials say it could get worse
A dozen facilities saw air traffic control shortages on Monday, delaying flights at several airports. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy blamed "a slight tick-up in sick calls" due to the shutdown.
Here are the finalists for the 2025 National Book Awards
This year's short list features novelists Rabih Alameddine and Megha Majumdar as well as five first-time nominees for nonfiction, including journalists Omar El Akkad and Julia Ioffe.
New books this week: Thomas Pynchon’s first novel in 12 years, and much more
In addition to Pynchon's Shadow Ticket, this week's releases include a new memoir from Dopesick author Beth Macy, and a coming-of-age story from former U.S. poet laureate Joy Harjo.