Supreme Court allows NIH to stop making nearly $800M in research grants for now
The Supreme Court on Thursday overturned by a 5-4 decision a lower court order, deciding at least temporarily, that the National Institute of Health does not need to continue paying out approximately $783 million in research grants to projects that the institute has since-stopped funding.
But the court, in its emergency docket order, also left in place by a 5-4 order a lower court ruling that threw out NIH memos that enforced the administration’s policies.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the court’s conservatives save Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with the court’s three liberals.
In February, the NIH, the “largest public funder of biomedical research in the world,” began terminating federal grants en masse for projects that did not “align with” the Trump administration’s policies.
In what the ACLU has referred to as “an ideological purge,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, instructed a re-evaluation of all grants funding or supporting “DEI and gender identity research activities and programs.” Funding was also withdrawn from projects studying “vaccine hesitancy” and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, projects that the NIH asserts have “outlasted” their “limited purpose.”
The NIH leaders argue that “awards can be terminated if they do not support agency objectives or policies” as noted in the NIH’s Notice of Award Stipulations. They compared this case to an April Supreme Court emergency docket decision where the justices allowed the administration to freeze $65 million worth of Department of Education DEI-related grants while the case proceeded in the lower courts.
Sixteen states, as well as advocacy organizations, and researchers disagreed—they sued the NIH and Kennedy, arguing that terminating the research grants was unconstitutional.
A federal district court judge concluded that the terminations were based on “no reasoned decision-making” and, after a bench trial, temporarily reinstated the grants. In his decision, Judge William Young, criticized the NIH for breaking “a historical norm of a largely apolitical scientific research agency.” The First Circuit Court of Appeals refused to intervene in the lower court’s temporary decision.
But on Thursday, the Supreme Court blocked the district court’s order, allowing the Trump administration to pause paying out grants to researchers as this case proceeds in the lower courts.
Russia sends 3 Iranian satellites into orbit, report says
The report said that a Russian rocket sent the satellites on Sunday from a launchpad in eastern Russia.
Viral global TikToks: A twist on soccer, Tanzania’s Charlie Chaplin, hope in Gaza
TikToks are everywhere (well, except countries like Australia and India, where they've been banned.) We talk to the creators of some of the year's most popular reels from the Global South.
This painting is missing. Do you have it?
An important work from a rediscovered artist has been absent from public view since the 1970s. A New York curator is hunting for it.
Memory loss: As AI gobbles up chips, prices for devices may rise
Demand for memory chips currently exceeds supply and there's very little chance of that changing any time soon. More chips for AI means less available for other products such as computers and phones and that could drive up those prices too.
Brigitte Bardot, sex goddess of cinema, has died
Legendary screen siren and animal rights activist Brigitte Bardot has died at age 91. The alluring former model starred in numerous movies, often playing the highly sexualized love interest.
For Ukrainians, a nuclear missile museum is a bitter reminder of what the country gave up
The Museum of Strategic Missile Forces tells the story of how Ukraine dismantled its nuclear weapons arsenal after independence in 1991. Today many Ukrainians believe that decision to give up nukes was a mistake.
