Supreme Court allows NIH to stop making nearly $800M in research grants for now
The Supreme Court on Thursday overturned by a 5-4 decision a lower court order, deciding at least temporarily, that the National Institute of Health does not need to continue paying out approximately $783 million in research grants to projects that the institute has since-stopped funding.
But the court, in its emergency docket order, also left in place by a 5-4 order a lower court ruling that threw out NIH memos that enforced the administration’s policies.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett sided with the court’s conservatives save Chief Justice John Roberts who sided with the court’s three liberals.
In February, the NIH, the “largest public funder of biomedical research in the world,” began terminating federal grants en masse for projects that did not “align with” the Trump administration’s policies.
In what the ACLU has referred to as “an ideological purge,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, instructed a re-evaluation of all grants funding or supporting “DEI and gender identity research activities and programs.” Funding was also withdrawn from projects studying “vaccine hesitancy” and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, projects that the NIH asserts have “outlasted” their “limited purpose.”
The NIH leaders argue that “awards can be terminated if they do not support agency objectives or policies” as noted in the NIH’s Notice of Award Stipulations. They compared this case to an April Supreme Court emergency docket decision where the justices allowed the administration to freeze $65 million worth of Department of Education DEI-related grants while the case proceeded in the lower courts.
Sixteen states, as well as advocacy organizations, and researchers disagreed—they sued the NIH and Kennedy, arguing that terminating the research grants was unconstitutional.
A federal district court judge concluded that the terminations were based on “no reasoned decision-making” and, after a bench trial, temporarily reinstated the grants. In his decision, Judge William Young, criticized the NIH for breaking “a historical norm of a largely apolitical scientific research agency.” The First Circuit Court of Appeals refused to intervene in the lower court’s temporary decision.
But on Thursday, the Supreme Court blocked the district court’s order, allowing the Trump administration to pause paying out grants to researchers as this case proceeds in the lower courts.
Iran’s soccer team cannot participate in the FIFA World Cup, Iranian minister says
Iran is set to play three games in the U.S. this June. But amid the U.S.-Israel military campaign that has killed Iran's supreme leader, Iran's sports minister said the team would pull out.
Pentagon probe points to U.S. missile hitting Iranian school
A military assessment suggests a U.S. Tomahawk cruise missile was responsible for at least 165 deaths at an Iranian girls' school, according to a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly.
Harrison Ford isn’t retiring: ‘I really wouldn’t know what to do with myself’
Ford struggled to find his footing in Hollywood before being cast as Han Solo in Star Wars. Now 83, he plays a therapist in the Apple TV series Shrinking: "I really do love the work," he says.
No Nobles Day: Britain’s Parliament boots its last hereditary Lords after 700 years
Government minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said the change put an end to "an archaic and undemocratic principle." The removed aristocrats are 92 of the House of Lords' 800 members.
On her new album, Kacey Musgraves returns home, to the ‘Middle of Nowhere’
Before making her upcoming sixth album, the country star returned to her small-town Texas home and discovered the power of in-between spaces. "I found a lot of clarity there," she says.
How the Iran war is disrupting air travel — and advice if you’re planning a trip
The war in Iran is roiling jet fuel prices and airlines are beginning to hike prices, unsettling travelers far from the Middle East. If you're booking a flight soon, here are things to know.
