Justice Department revokes Biden-era protections for reporters in leak investigations
The Justice Department on Friday rescinded a Biden-era policy that provided protections to journalists in leak investigations, paving the way for authorities to once again use subpoenas and compel testimony from reporters in probes targeting leakers.
“Federal government employees intentionally leaking sensitive information to the media undermines the ability of the Department of Justice to uphold the rule of law, protect civil rights, and keep America safe. This conduct is illegal and wrong, and it must stop,” Attorney General Pam Bondi said in an internal memo issued on Friday and obtained by NPR.
She said the DOJ’s policy allows for subpoenas, court orders and search warrants to get information and testimony from journalists. Such actions must be approved by DOJ leadership and journalists must get advance notice of them. The actions also must be as narrow as possible to avoid interfering with news gathering or “potentially protected materials,” the memo states.
During the Biden administration, the Justice Department said it would no longer secretly seize the records of reporters to identify their sources when investigating leaks, except under limited, specified circumstances.
Bondi’s memo marks a sharp break with that policy and returns to a more aggressive approach to leak investigations used during President Trump’s first term in office, as well as during the presidency of Barack Obama.
In the memo, the attorney general specifically cited instances of leaks under the Trump administration, including sharing classified info about intelligence assessments on the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua and news of Dan Caldwell, an adviser to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, being put on leave.
Bondi said press independence is important and the DOJ would defend it, “despite the lack of independence of certain members of the legacy news media.” She wrote that the department would try to limit forcing journalists to share information by seeking “enhanced approval” and “advance-notice procedures.”
“The Attorney General must also approve efforts to question or arrest members of thew [sic] news media,” she wrote.
Bruce Brown, president of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said that protections for journalists not only serve reporters, but the American public more broadly.
“Some of the most consequential reporting in U.S. history — from Watergate to warrantless wiretapping after 9/11 — was and continues to be made possible because reporters have been able to protect the identities of confidential sources and uncover and report stories that matter to people across the political spectrum,” Brown said in a statement.
On ‘The Life of a Showgirl,’ Taylor Swift feels love’s glow and the spotlight’s glare
On her 12th album, the most dominant pop star of our era makes a spectacle of herself in full flower, in love and holding the music industry in the palm of her hand.
FDA approves another generic abortion pill, prompting outrage from conservatives
Drugmaker Evita Solutions announced on its website that the Food and Drug Administration signed off on its low-cost form of the pill, which is approved to end pregnancies through 10 weeks.
As the shutdown drags on, the threat of permanent cuts is mired in politics
President Trump is meeting with his budget director, Russ Vought, about what additional cuts to make during the shutdown, and the president says his targets are partisan.
Pope Leo’s religious community is drawing renewed interest. Here’s what makes it unique
"Before, we might get two or three discerners. But after Pope Leo, I now have 15. It's unbelievable."
The CDC still hasn’t issued COVID vaccine guidelines, leaving access in limbo
Access to the COVID-19 vaccines remains difficult because of an unusual and unexplained delay by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in accepting recommendations from its advisers.
National Guard presence may deter crime, but experts warn of the long-term costs
As President Trump ramps up efforts to send federal officers and troops into cities, criminologists are watching closely. Are the feds doing this in a smart way?