Is it ‘Made in USA’? The answer can be complicated
As tariffs reshape supply chains, more Americans may be checking packaging for the “Made in USA” label, either to sidestep import taxes or to support domestic businesses. But intricate trade rules and far-flung manufacturing networks can mean the country-of-origin stamp may tell only part of the story.
The label “Made in USA” means that all or virtually all of a product — including its parts and assembly — must originate in the United States. However, “virtually all” doesn’t mean everything has to be U.S.-made.
“‘Made in U.S.A.’ is a very specific, very high standard,” says Marcus Eeman, senior manager of customs at global logistics firm Flexport.
According to the Federal Trade Commission, which oversees country of origin claims in marketing and advertising, to qualify for the label, U.S. authorities must determine that a product’s final assembly or processing has taken place in the U.S., and that a significant portion of its manufacturing costs must also be incurred domestically.
“You probably will never see a car that says ‘Made in America,’ but you will see it that says ‘Assembled in America,’ probably with some foreign components as well,” Eeman explains.
That said, some foreign components are allowed to still qualify as “Made in U.S.A.” — as long as they don’t substantially transform the product. Eeman explains that this concept dates back to a 1908 Supreme Court case involving Anheuser-Busch, which used cork from Spain to cap beer bottles. The Court ruled that the cork didn’t transform the product, since it didn’t change the beer’s name, character, or use.
Determining a product’s country of origin through the “substantial transformation” test can be tricky, Eeman says. “There is a case where a bulk block of lipstick material was shipped from Italy to China,” he says. In China, the block was melted, shaped and packaged. Despite this, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) ruled that the country of origin was still Italy.
The U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration offers other examples. Ingredients such as sugar, flour, dairy, and nuts can be imported, but once they are baked into cookies in the U.S., the final product is considered substantially transformed — and may carry a “Made in USA” label, it says.
However, bilateral trade agreements can override these rules. Under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), for example, a one-time importation of a commercial product valued under $2,500 is exempt from country of origin labeling requirements.

Then, there is “Assembled in USA.” The FTC says, “A product that includes foreign components may be called ‘Assembled in USA’ without qualification when its principal assembly takes place in the U.S. and the assembly is substantial.”
But not all assembly counts. The FTC specifies that a “simple ‘screwdriver’ operation” doesn’t qualify. For instance, importing components such as a motherboard and hard drive and merely assembling them into a computer in the U.S. would not justify an “Assembled in USA” label. A more accurate claim would be “Made in U.S. from Imported Parts.”
“You’ll likely never see a car labeled ‘Made in America,’ ” Eeman adds, “but you might see one labeled ‘Assembled in America,’ often with some foreign components.”
Things can get even more complicated when it comes to food products, specifically pork and beef.
In 2015, Mexico and Canada successfully challenged U.S. country of origin labeling (COOL) requirements for pork and beef at the World Trade Organization. The WTO found that rules that muscle cuts of beef and pork, and ground beef and pork must be labeled with their country of origin unfairly disadvantaged foreign producers, leading Congress to repeal the COOL requirements for those meats.

“Beef and pork, which were once required to be labeled, [now] don’t have any country of origin labeling requirements,” says Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy at the non-profit Consumer Federation of America. “You can take a cow that spends its entire life in Mexico… ship it back across the border, slaughter it the same day, and call it a ‘Ground beef product of the USA.'”
Still, Pam Lewison, agriculture research director at the Washington Policy Center, notes that most U.S. meat is in fact produced domestically. But for other food items, she says, country of origin labeling remains complicated. “Ideally, you want to see a label that says the product was made, produced, and sourced from the United States.”
She adds a word of caution to consumers: “If you’re buying asparagus in December, you shouldn’t fool yourself about where it’s coming from — it’s not coming from here.”
RFK’s plan to phase out synthetic food dyes could face industry pushback
The health secretary announced a push to eliminate petroleum-based colorants from the food supply. But he'll need to get food companies on board.
As Tesla profits plunge 71%, Elon Musk says he’ll spend less time on DOGE
Elon Musk says he'll cut back his work with the federal government to one to two days per week. He said demand for Teslas is still strong, despite protests and plunging sales.
Judge blocks Trump administration plans to dismantle Voice of America
A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction stopping the Trump administration from dismantling Voice of America, the federally funded overseas news outlet.
Supreme Court leans toward parents who object to LGBTQ books in public schools
At the center of the case is the school system in Montgomery County, Md., the most religiously diverse county in the U.S., with 160,000 students of almost all faiths.
Oscar voters actually need to watch the nominated movies now
In an announcement Monday about rules for the next Oscars, the Academy also said that a film's use of generative AI and other digital tools "neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination."
Inside Harvard’s lawsuit against the Trump administration
Harvard's lawsuit questions how freezing research funds will further the administration's goal of eliminating antisemitism on campus.