Harvard and the Trump administration return to court over international students
Lawyers from Harvard University and the Trump administration will be back in federal court in Boston on Monday over Harvard’s ability to enroll international students.
On June 4, President Trump issued a proclamation preventing Harvard’s international students from entering the country, citing national security concerns.
Rather than disqualifying Harvard students from receiving visas, as other federal agencies have attempted to do, the presidential order marked the first time Trump has stepped in directly, using his executive powers to limit Harvard. His executive order says the university has failed to account for “known illegal activity” by students there.
“Admission into the United States to attend, conduct research, or teach at our Nation’s institutions of higher education is a privilege granted by our Government, not a guarantee,” the proclamation states.
The Trump administration has also argued that Harvard violated students’ civil rights, including failing to protect Jewish students, and that banning the school from enrolling international students is warranted.
The Ivy League school amended an existing lawsuit against the administration to ask a judge to block the order, calling the president’s actions “another illegal retaliatory step,” and claiming the government is in violation of the school’s First Amendment rights.
U.S. District Judge Alison D. Burroughs, an Obama appointee, issued a temporary block and on Monday will decide whether to extend it until Harvard’s lawsuit goes to trial.
Harvard enrolls about 7,000 international students, more than a quarter of the student body. While the legal battle plays out, Harvard has maintained that it will continue enrolling international students, based on the previous temporary order of the court.
“The court hearing is a very big deal for international students,” says Alfred Williamson, who is from Wales in the United Kingdom, and just finished his first year at Harvard. “The part that is most frustrating and scary is that there’s nothing we can do to influence the outcome. We just have to sit here and wait and cross our fingers.”
The battle over international students is one of several fronts in a running campaign by the administration, which has also cancelled grants and threatened Harvard’s tax-exempt status.
“The fight seems far from over,” says Williamson, who faces uncertainty over what his sophomore year will look like and whether he’ll be able to attend Harvard. “As international students we can’t really see the end of it.”
Denmark summons U.S. envoy over claims of interference in Greenland
Denmark's foreign minister summoned the top U.S. diplomat in the country for talks after the main national broadcaster reported that at least three people with connections to President Donald Trump have been carrying out covert influence operations in Greenland.
What will the end of the ‘de minimis’ rule mean for U.S. consumers?
On Friday, the U.S. is ending its de minimis rule that made it easy for cheap goods to reach consumers. The change will affect roughly 4 million such packages processed each day.
Speaker Johnson slashed Medicaid. His constituents could lose health services
In Mike Johnson's district, not only could thousands of Louisianians lose coverage, health centers are bracing for a financial hit. They're hoping for additional funding to make up for Medicaid cuts.
Pascagoula still shows Hurricane Katrina’s heavy toll in Mississippi 20 years later
While much of the city was rebuilt over the past 20 years, it has never fully recovered. The cost of rebuilding has been prohibitive for many former residents.
Politicians keep using songs on social media. What if an artist doesn’t like it?
Having a song go viral is usually good news for an artist. But as politicians become more social media savvy and jump in on viral trends, how can musicians respond if they don't like the way a party or administration uses their song?
‘AI slop’ videos may be annoying, but they’re racking up views — and ad money
Critics say that "slop" videos made with generative AI are often repetitive or useless. But they get millions of views — and platforms are grappling with what to do about them.
