German and Swedish jets intercept Russian military plane over Baltic Sea
German and Swedish fighter jets were scrambled to intercept a Russian reconnaissance plane that entered neutral airspace over the Baltic Sea on Sunday morning, officials from Germany and Sweden said.
German officials said NATO ordered Germany’s “quick reaction alert force” to investigate an unidentified aircraft flying without a plan or radio contact.
“The aircraft turned out to be a Russian IL-20M reconnaissance plane. After visually identifying it, the Bundeswehr [German military] handed over the escort to our Swedish NATO partners @SwedenNato and returned to Rostock-Laage,” Germany’s delegation to NATO said in a post on X.
Sweden’s air force said its fighters were “identifying and monitoring a Russian IL-20 reconnaissance aircraft in international airspace.”
This was the latest event after a series of incursions by Russian military aircraft into NATO airspace in September, leading to heightened tensions between NATO and Russia.
On Friday, Estonia said three Russian MiG-31 fighter jets entered its airspace without permission and remained there for a total of 12 minutes.
Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal invoked NATO’s Article 4, which allows NATO members to hold consultations with the alliance when any state believes it is under threat.
Estonia also summoned Moscow’s charge d’affaires in protest, but Russia’s Ministry of Defense denied the allegation that it had violated Estonian airspace.
President Trump was asked about the incident by reporters on Friday.
“Well, I don’t love it. I don’t love it when that happens. Could be big trouble,” Trump said.
NATO’s Article 4 was also triggered days earlier by Poland after more than a dozen Russian drones arrived in Polish airspace on Sept. 10, leading Poland to shoot down some of them.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the event “the closest we have been to open conflict since World War II.”
In another incident, on Sept. 14, Romania reported that a Russian drone had breached its airspace. Russia claimed without evidence that the incident was a provocation by Ukraine.
Hanno Pevkur, Estonia’s minister of defense, said in an interview with Estonia’s public broadcaster ERR that NATO had demonstrated that it can effectively respond and use force, if necessary, against violations by Russia.
“This is exactly what Russia wants — to divert our attention away from helping Ukraine, and to focus on our own backyard. That has been one of Russia’s strategic aims: To get the West to mind its own business while Russia deals with Ukraine. That is a key goal behind these kinds of provocations,” Pevkur said.
Opinion: Remembering Ai, a remarkably intelligent chimpanzee
We remember Ai, a highly intelligent chimpanzee who lived at the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University for most of her life, except the time she escaped and walked around campus.
The near death — and last-minute reprieve — of a trial for an HIV vaccine
A trial was about to launch for a vaccine that would ward off the HIV virus. It would be an incredible breakthrough. Then it looked as if it would be over before it started.
Bessemer data center developer to request rezoning for additional 900 acres
The city’s attorney informed council members of the request on Tuesday, warning that there may be media scrutiny.
Is RFK Jr.’s Administration for a Healthy America — AHA — in the works or not?
The Administration for a Healthy America is RFK Jr.'s plan to tackle chronic disease, addiction and other persistent problems. But so far it's not being set up like previous new agencies.
They quit their day jobs to bet on current events. A look inside the prediction market mania
Prediction market apps are thriving in Trump's second term, with traders betting on migrant deportations to election outcomes. A community of young, mostly male and very online traders are driving the industry's bonanza.
Events in Minneapolis show how immigration enforcement has changed. What’s the impact?
Minneapolis is at the center of sweeping, evolving federal immigration push. It demonstrates how different immigration enforcement is under Trump's second administration - and raises questions about the lingering effects on local communities and law enforcement.
