EPA plans to end a program that makes solar power available to low-income Americans

The Trump Administration says it will end a $7 billion program to help low-income households and communities get access to affordable solar energy. The move is part of President Trump’s effort to reverse former President Biden’s climate agenda and boost fossil fuels instead.

The “Solar for All” program had aimed to help more than 900,000 low-income households reduce pollution, and utility bills. Solar for All funded efforts around the country to provide rooftop solar panels, community solar farms, and battery storage.

Now, the fate of the program is in question, the Trump administration argues, because of a massive spending and tax bill Republicans passed last month.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a social media post that the new law repeals “the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, including a $7 billion program called Solar for All.” Zeldin did not offer details about how and when the program would be cut back or shut down.

The Solar for All money had already been obligated to state entities like the West Virginia Office of Energy, the Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, and the Michigan Department of Environment. Under the program, the entities then gave grants to lending institutions that fund solar and battery projects, and to installers and project developers themselves. Some funding also went to organizations focused on expanding solar for tribal communities. And some money went through multistate solar programs like GRID Alternatives.

Because the money was considered obligated, grantees argue the Trump administration can’t reclaim it now.

“We and many others are prepared to take them to court,” says Jillian Blanchard, vice president of climate change and environment justice at Lawyers for Good Government, which is working with grantees. Blanchard says the new law “rescinded only a much smaller portion of money — of unobligated funds.”

A key element of the Solar for All program is helping low-income households.

Having solar “means that people can essentially have more money to pay for other essential needs, such as food and healthcare. Both of which are rising in price simultaneously,” says Sanya Carley, professor of energy policy at the University of Pennsylvania.

 ”By removing this program, a program that was designed specifically to help low and moderate income households, it essentially means that these households won’t be able to benefit from these reduced bills,” Carley says.

A year ago the EPA awarded Colorado’s Solar for All program $156 million. The governor’s office said that would expand access to solar power to more than 20,000 Coloradans.

“The Trump Administration is seeking to rip cost-saving solutions out of the hands of hardworking Coloradans and push us backwards into an over reliance on non-renewable resources,” Democratic Gov. Jared Polis said in a statement.

The EPA under Biden had estimated that the program would produce over $350 million in annual savings on electric bills for low-income households across the country. Also, rooftop and community solar can help households avoid power shutoffs, which are dangerous in extreme heat and cold.

The Solar for All program, and the solar projects across the country, would have meant significant greenhouse gas reductions, says Costa Samaras, director of the Scott Institute for Energy Innovation at Carnegie Mellon University. “We need all the clean power we can get right now,” he says.