Alabama Supreme Court Causes Marriage License Confusion
In an order released Monday, the Alabama Supreme Court is inviting parties to submit briefs “addressing the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision” in Obergefell v. Hodges.
Many lawyers and other experts first interpreted the order as a 25-day buffer period before Alabama probate judges would have to begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. However, further analysis concluded that the order does not include any directions for probate judges.
John Carroll, former U.S. Magistrate Judge and Samford law professor, says the order gives probate judges some temporary power.
“It meant that the probate judges don’t have to issue the licenses [to same-sex couples],” he says, “but they can if they want to.”
Carroll says it’s unclear whether the 25-day buffer period still stands, and the Alabama Supreme Court will have to give further direction before anything will change.
“I think the court’s going to have to issue another order,” he says, “or I think probate judges will continue doing what’s going on now– which is some are issuing licenses and some aren’t.”
An Associated Press telephone survey of counties on Monday found that nearly half of Alabama’s counties (at least 32 of the state’s 67 counties) were issuing the licenses to gay couples.
Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore agreed with Carroll’s assessment. “What the order means is that within that 25-day period no [probate judge] has to issue a marriage license to a same sex couple,” Moore told al.com.
Why 25 days?
“Every appellate court, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has a period of time after they rule for the parties to seek rehearing,” says Carroll.
According to U.S. Supreme Court Rule 44 , “Any petition for the rehearing of any judgment or decision of the Court on the merits shall be filed within 25 days after entry of the judgment or decision.”
“If the court doesn’t grant rehearing in 25 days, then the order is in deed final,” says Carroll. “No one, quite frankly, expects the ruling of the Supreme Court to be altered in any shape or form.”
No More Licenses
Several Alabama counties, like Pike County, have shut down marriage license operations altogether.
Reporting for NPR, Troy Public Radio’s Kyle Gassiott says “marriage licenses haven’t been issued (in Pike County) to gay or straight couples since February, in protest of an earlier court decision that briefly legalized gay marriage in the state.” On Friday, Pike County Probate Judge Wes Allen released a statement saying he believes the U.S. Supreme Court overstepped its authority and that Pike County would no long issue marriage licenses to anyone.
Additional reporting provided by the Associated Press. Updated Tuesday, June 30 with additional information on U.S. Supreme Court rehearing rules.
RFK’s plan to phase out synthetic food dyes could face industry pushback
The health secretary announced a push to eliminate petroleum-based colorants from the food supply. But he'll need to get food companies on board.
As Tesla profits plunge 71%, Elon Musk says he’ll spend less time on DOGE
Elon Musk says he'll cut back his work with the federal government to one to two days per week. He said demand for Teslas is still strong, despite protests and plunging sales.
Judge blocks Trump administration plans to dismantle Voice of America
A federal judge granted a preliminary injunction stopping the Trump administration from dismantling Voice of America, the federally funded overseas news outlet.
Supreme Court leans toward parents who object to LGBTQ books in public schools
At the center of the case is the school system in Montgomery County, Md., the most religiously diverse county in the U.S., with 160,000 students of almost all faiths.
Oscar voters actually need to watch the nominated movies now
In an announcement Monday about rules for the next Oscars, the Academy also said that a film's use of generative AI and other digital tools "neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination."
Inside Harvard’s lawsuit against the Trump administration
Harvard's lawsuit questions how freezing research funds will further the administration's goal of eliminating antisemitism on campus.
