Site icon WBHM 90.3

Signal chat fallout, tariff tension — and 3 more takeaways from Trump’s week

President Donald Trump, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13.

President Donald Trump, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth listen to a question from a reporter during a meeting in the Oval Office of the White House on March 13.

We’ll be recapping what you need to know every Friday morning for the first 100 days of the Trump administration. Get more updates and analysis in the NPR Politics newsletter.


The week has been dominated by the Signal group chat among high-ranking Trump administration officials that a reporter was apparently inadvertently added to. There’s been plenty of other headlines. More tariffs went into effect that could raise the price of cars. There was more controversy surrounding Trump’s deportation efforts. And there are questions about the administration’s approach to the war in Ukraine.

Here are five takeaways from the week, followed by a day-by-day look at everything that happened this week on this 67th day of the second Trump presidency:

1. The group chat response draws on a Trump political playbook, but there are serious questions about security and professionalism.

The administration’s spin cycle went into overdrive, opening up the Trumpian playbook by denying, downplaying and attacking the messenger. But no matter how much they try to argue over technical assertions of what’s classified or not, it doesn’t change the reality that senior administration officials discussed highly sensitive information with specific details and times about an imminent military operation not in a secure environment like the White House Situation Room or sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) but on a nongovernmental messaging platform. (NPR President and CEO Katherine Maher is chair of the Signal Foundation, the nonprofit that supports the Signal messaging app.)

That goes against protocol, and the Defense Department has warned for years against not using the platform for any non-public information and issued a Pentagon-wide advisory earlier this month that the app has been a target of Russian hackers. The Trump team has minimized what happened, tried to discredit the reporter and claim that this was an “appropriate channel” to have the conversation, as CIA Director John Ratcliffe did in a congressional hearing this week.

2. Trump officials and their congressional supporters have tried to deflect and make this simply about how a reporter was added to the chat, but lawmakers want more answers.

Republicans have called it a “mistake,” but the “it” appears to be adding a reporter to the channel, not that the conversation took place on Signal at all. Trump himself doesn’t appear to think this is a very big deal, either. That was made clear by his wondering aloud on Wednesday why anyone was mentioning Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was the one giving specific times about when bombings would take place — and how — hours before they were dropped.

“Hegseth? How do you bring Hegseth into it?” Trump said, responding to a reporter’s question. “He had nothing to do with it. Look, look — it’s all a witch hunt.”

Not only has the Pentagon said the app, while convenient, warned of using it for nonpublic official information. Conversations like these are supposed to be preserved, archived – and likely classified, but the released texts from The Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg show they were set to disappear on the app by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz.

This isn’t the end of the story, because a bipartisan group of lawmakers wants an investigation. Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker, the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee said the conversation “appears to me to be of such a sensitive nature that, based on my knowledge, I would have wanted it classified.”

He called for an expedited inspector general’s report, though that may prove difficult. Just days after Trump was sworn in, he fired more than a dozen IGs across multiple agencies, including the Defense Department.

3. Tariffs on cars likely mean higher prices on yet another key item — and a potential political problem on the horizon for Republicans.

It’s no secret that a big reason Trump was elected was to bring prices down. But his actions in his first months as president are likely to lead to higher prices. Tariffs on Canada and Mexico could also increase food prices, because the U.S. imports a lot of agriculture from Mexico, in particular. Tariffs on China are likely to lead to higher prices on cheap goods Americans buy.

And this week, it’s 25% tariffs on foreign-made cars and car parts that are likely to lead to higher auto prices. Trump has acknowledged that his tariffs may make things more expensive.

“We may have some, short-term, a little bit of pain,” Trump said last month, “and people understand that.”

That’s his gamble — that in the long run, these tariffs will even out trade imbalances and increase U.S. manufacturing. It’s something the auto worker union is glad to see, applauding Trump for ending what it sees as the “free-trade disaster.” But will people accept higher prices on groceries and cars when they’re already high?

“Now voters are saying, ‘OK, you’ve been elected; we know you’re going to be disruptive; we know you’re going to be that wrecking ball,'” said Kristen Soltis Anderson, a Republican pollster, “‘but where’s the reduced cost of living I was looking for?'”

Soltis Anderson said while Trump’s overall approval ratings are higher than where he was in his first term, his economic approval has slipped. This week, the Consumer Confidence Index dropped to a 12-year low. That is quite the risky position for a president, especially one who promised to bring prices down on Day 1. Given that Trump is barred from running again and if prices do go up, it could be something felt by the GOP in next year’s midterm elections.

4. Trump continues to push the limits with deportations — and it’s getting closer to the Supreme Court weighing in.

One of the areas where Americans give Trump his highest marks is on immigration. But his administration is continuing to battle the courts and push the limits with its arguments. This week, the administration refused to give a judge more details on its timeline on deportation flights of Venezuelans the administration says are members of the Tren de Aragua gang.

The administration cited the “state secrets privilege,” but Judge James Boasberg wasn’t buying it, calling its response “woefully insufficient.”

An appeals panel, 2-1, sided with Boasberg and denied the administration’s push to restart deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, noting that the administration hasn’t given those targeted the chance to prove they’re not part of the gang before sending them to a country they’re not even from where they’re imprisoned for an indefinite period of time. The Trump administration said it will be appealing to the Supreme Court.

Boasberg was also assigned to a lawsuit over the Signal chat group. It alleges use of the platform in this way violates federal recordkeeping laws.

5. More pro-Palestinian students were rounded up. Trump’s betting he wins the debate on executive power vs. freedom of speech. 

A doctoral student at Tufts University was taken into custody off the street by plain-clothesed officers with face coverings and whisked away to a detention facility in Louisiana. The student, a Turkish national, was in the U.S. on a valid student visa. But that visa has since been revoked.

The student had co-authored an opinion piece criticizing university leadership for its position on the war in Gaza.

“This is not about free speech,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio said earlier this month when asked about the detention of Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil. “This is about people that don’t have a right to be in the United States to begin with. … No one has a right to a student visa. No one has a right to a green card.”

But the students all have one thing in common — they spoke out against Israel’s approach to the war in Gaza.

More Americans’ sympathies lie with Israelis than Palestinians, but it’s at the lowest level in at least a quarter century since Gallup data is available on the question and, for the first time, below 50%. More Republicans have sympathy for Israelis, more Democrats for Palestinians. Democrats’ support has spiked as the war has carried on. Independents narrowly side with Israelis.

So Trump may feel he has public opinion on his side to continue with these kinds of expulsions and may try to make the debate about: 1. this not being about the war in Gaza at all, but 2. about ending anti-semitism on campuses. The question is: Is there room in the United States for a debate about what defines antisemitism and whether anyone has the right to criticize the government of Israel’s conduct of the war? The administration is bluntly making the point that certainly not if you’re a foreign student.

Elon Musk, wearing a red hat, looks on as President Donald Trump hosts a cabinet meeting at the White House on March 24. (Brendan Smialowski | AFP via Getty Images)

Here’s a day-by-day look at what happened this past week (since we last posted our roundup):

Friday, March 21:

Saturday:

Sunday:

Monday:

Tuesday:

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., points to text messages by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a hearing on March 26. The hearing held by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence addressed top aides inadvertently including Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief for The Atlantic, on a high-level Trump administration Signal group chat discussing plans to bomb Houthi targets in Yemen. (Kayla Bartkowski | Getty Images)

Wednesday:

President Donald J Trump speaks to reporters about auto tariffs after signing an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House on March 26. (Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Thursday:

NPR disclosure: Katherine Maher, the CEO of NPR, chairs the board of the Signal Foundation.

Exit mobile version