Site icon WBHM 90.3

A hot seat for Musk, the trade war and third-term talk: Takeaways from the week

President Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a trade announcement event in the White House Rose Garden on April 2.

President Trump holds up a chart while speaking during a trade announcement event in the White House Rose Garden on April 2.

A GOP electoral warning points to Elon Musk in the hot seat, and President Trump employs a third-term distraction. Also, the trade war rages, and there were mass firings at key scientific agencies.

It was another week of big headlines as President Trump, in his seventh week of his second term, continued to overhaul policy, both foreign and domestic.

Here are four takeaways from the week in our continued look at President Trump’s first 100 days in office:

1. Musk in the spotlight after Democrats win in Wisconsin.

Musk became the central figure in a judicial race in Wisconsin. He spent $20 million there and made an appearance in the state just ahead of the election, where he raised the stakes. But in a state that Trump won by a point in 2024, the Republican-endorsed judicial candidate lost on Tuesday by 10 points.

That’s a pretty big loss for the party, but especially for Musk. He put a lot on the line there, and given how controversial his team’s federal cuts have been, that was a big risk. Now, Democrats feel emboldened to run against Musk and make him the face of Trump’s agenda. Republicans, meanwhile, are questioning the world’s richest man’s political value.

“I’m honestly shocked,” Pam Van Handel, chair of the Republican Party of Outagamie County in Wisconsin, told Politico. “I thought we had it in the bag. I thought [Musk] was going to be an asset for this race. People love Trump, but maybe they don’t love everybody he supports. Maybe I have blinders on.”

Republicans on Capitol Hill, though, don’t want to show any break with Trump, and they’d still love Musk’s money, but they might not like what a wild card he can be. DOGE, his informal Department of Government Efficiency, has caused them headaches at town halls, and his comments about potentially cutting entitlements is like political kryptonite.

He’s more unpopular than Trump, and this loss in Wisconsin means the heat shield he may have been for Trump to be able to absorb negativity about federal government restructuring is melting. It appears political gravity is setting in for Musk, and don’t be surprised if he’s out after his 130-day special government employee status expires at the end of next month.

Businessman Elon Musk speaks during a town hall meeting at the KI Convention Center on March 30 in Green Bay, Wisc., ahead of the state's high-profile Supreme Court election between Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel, who has been financially backed by Musk and endorsed by President Donald Trump, and Dane County Circuit Court Judge Susan Crawford.
Businessman Elon Musk speaks during a town hall meeting at the KI Convention Center on March 30 in Green Bay, Wisc., ahead of the state’s high-profile Supreme Court election between Circuit Court Judge Brad Schimel, who has been financially backed by Musk and endorsed by President Donald Trump, and Dane County Circuit Court Judge Susan Crawford. (Scott Olson | Getty Images)

Then Republicans will be hoping he stays quiet and just writes the checks.

2. Trump’s real goals in floating a third term: Distract from bad news and try not to be a lame duck.  

In politics, to stay relevant, you never want to completely wave people off from the notion that you’re at least thinking about running for president. But what do you do when you’re president and facing a constitutional amendment that bars you from running again?

Cryptically say you’re looking at ways to do it, and float at least one far-flung theory that’s remotely possible. That’s what Trump did this week when he told NBC’s Kristen Welker that his team is looking at it and that he’s “not joking.” He was more cagey the next day when NPR’s Tamara Keith pressed him on Air Force One about the comments. Trump repeatedly said he didn’t want to talk about it, that’s it’s far off and didn’t commit to leaving the White House on Jan. 20, 2029 when the next president should be sworn in.

Trump’s provocative comments serve a few of other political purposes: (1) set the stage to run for an unconstitutional third term by normalizing the idea of something abnormal that chips away at democratic norms; (2) help avoid being a lame duck — if people think it’s possible he runs again, then his agenda matters more in his last two years than a traditionally term-limited president would be; and (3) distract from bad news — like the Signal chat group controversy that was still getting attention when he made the comments and his trade war that is ringing market alarm bells around the world all while continuing to make drastic cuts at key federal agencies.

3. Trump tries to build the wall — of tariffs. Get ready for higher prices.

“A lot of people are tired of watching the other countries ripping off the United States,” Trump said, adding, “They laugh at us. Behind our backs, they laugh at us because of our own stupidity.”

Trump on Wednesday announcing his broad, sweeping tariffs on the U.S.’s top trading partners all over the world? No. It was him in 1987 talking about tariffs on Larry King Live. Trump has long loved the idea of tariffs — first on Japan, then when its economy went into recession, he shifted his gaze to China.

But it’s never great policy to be ideologically rigid and not adjust with the times. Trump’s trade war is now roiling markets, and experts are warning of higher prices and slower growth, as well as potential recessions in other countries.

What’s more, these tariffs are coming after an election when prices were the top concern for voters — and Trump made a pretty big promise.

“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down,” Trump said in August of last year.

Well, not immediately, clearly. After he was elected, he said bringing prices down would be “hard.” After being sworn in, he said, actually, he never thought inflation was really the top issue in the campaign, anyway — that it was immigration.

“[Y]ou can only talk about it so long,” Trump told House Republicans a week after he was inaugurated. “The price of apples doubled; the price of bacon has quadrupled; everything is a disaster. And you say it — and then what do you do?”

This lack of a focus on bringing down prices in the short term — and actively likely making them higher — is a serious political gamble Trump is taking for his party. He believes he can convince people to give him the space to set the country on a track to bring back more manufacturing by building a wall of tariffs.

But so far, they aren’t. In fact, his economic approval ratings have been trending downward and below his overall rating. Two polls this week, AP/NORC and Reuters/Ipsos, show Trump’s overall approval at his lowest point since being sworn in for his second term — 42% and 43%, respectively.

His economic approval in AP’s poll is 40%, while in Reuters’ it’s 37%, including just 30% for his efforts to lower the cost of living.

4. The federal cuts hit health agencies.

Speaking of other substantive things Trump may be trying to distract from, his administration began firing some 10,000 staffers at the Department of Health and Human Services this week.

The cuts included leaders and some of the country’s leading scientists and researchers, as well as the forcing out of the Food and Drug Administration’s top vaccine regulator, Dr. Peter Marks.

Despite that, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. claimed in an interview last week on NewsNation, “We’re not cutting scientists. We’re not cutting frontline workers.”

He talked of trying to make the “sprawling” agencies, as he called them, more efficient when it comes to things like human resources and communications. It’s possible that there were mistakes made in who received reduction-in-force notices, as there have been with some of the other cuts made.

But many see dangers to the country in what’s already been done.

“It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies,” Marks wrote in his letter of resignation.

Dr. Ashish Jha, who was President Biden’s COVID-19 response coordinator and is currently dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, told NPR: “I’m worried that what we’re going to see is more people getting sick, more disease outbreaks and infrastructure that is going to be less and less capable of responding to those threats.”

Wendy Armstrong, director of infectious diseases at the University of Colorado and vice president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, was even more blunt in an interview with The Bulwark: “It’s astounding. It will affect patients with all kinds of different kinds of infections, and Americans will suffer, and people will die, and that’s a horrible thing to see coming.”

Over several decades, the United States has become a leader in science research, relied upon not just domestically but internationally. That’s because agencies under HHS like the National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration study and help fund and develop breakthroughs in everything from autism and cancer to neurological disease.

They’re gatekeepers for the medicines Americans take, and they’re on the front lines of helping to stop the spread of infectious diseases and help develop vaccines that help prevent the spread of pandemics.

These agencies had long had bipartisan support and were among the most trusted in the federal government. But COVID changed all that. Largely because of widespread online misinformation given credence by political leaders on the right, these agencies became lightning rods and officials were vilified by MAGA.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Louisiana Republican and chairman of the Senate Health committee, is calling on Kennedy to testify to explain the cuts.

Employees of the Department of Health and Human Services stand in line to enter the Mary E. Switzer Memorial Building on April 2. Layoffs began earlier this week at the agency after it was announced last week that the Trump administration plans to cut 10,000 HHS jobs (Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images)

“The news coverage on the HHS reorg is being set by anonymous sources and opponents are setting the perceptions,” Cassidy said in a statement. “In the confirmation process, RFK committed to coming before the committee on a quarterly basis. This will be a good opportunity for him to set the record straight and speak to the goals, structure and benefits of the proposed reorganization.”

Here’s a day-by-day look at what happened in the past week:

Friday, March 28:

Saturday:

Sunday:

Monday:

Tuesday:

Wednesday:

Thursday:

Exit mobile version