How Do You Know That?

 1570258006 
1644328920

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about listener feedback to WBHM and how the news you hear comes from a variety of sources.

This week, I want to share another feedback story with you – this time from me.

Sunday night, I turned on the radio and heard this episode of On Being. If you’re not familiar with the program, it airs Sunday night from 6 to 7, and it is described as a program about the big questions in life. What does it mean to be human? How do we want to live? And who will we be to each other?

When I heard this interview with guest Trabian Shorters, it was fascinating. Just the kind of programming you expect to hear on public radio. The conversation I heard focused on how we have a habit of seeing deficits — and of defining people in terms of their problems. This has not only doomed some of our best efforts to failure, it leaves all of us prone to cynicism and hopelessness. There was a lot more to the conversation than this, and I highly recommend you listen to it, but I want to focus on one specific part. Shorters said, The CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has reported that news consumption is a health hazard, right? [laughs] We’re stressing ourselves out. Like, it’s crazy.

I wondered about this statement and wrote to the producers asking about this specific reference.

Attribution in its most basic form means How do you know that? Are you stating your opinion or referencing a credible source? In journalism, everything must be attributed. However, that doesn’t mean attribution needs to show up everywhere in the story. Otherwise, a story would get completely bogged down.

If it’s something that’s been widely reported or is common knowledge, then I would say there’s no need to attribute within the body of a specific work. However, if it’s something that people will hear and might wonder about (like I did), then I think it’s reasonable to include the specific reference – at least in the online transcript. The statement, to my ear seemed unusual, though certainly plausible. And I would like to think I would’ve heard of such a statement from the CDC in the news cycle before, but it’s certainly possible I missed it. I’m not saying Mr. Shorters was wrong so much as please show me where this information came from. And while On Being is not a news program, it is nevertheless important to take note when guests cite specific information.

Getting back to my story, I wrote to the producers, and they wrote back to tell me they added an Editor’s Note in the transcript citing the specific reference from the CDC. I’ll admit, this is not the most riveting story, but that’s my point. This is exactly how feedback with a national program should work. WBHM and On Being (and all the programs we air) are partners in bringing you essential information. We get it right more often than not, but there’s always room for feedback and improvement about ways we can better do our jobs and better serve you.

(Through “Programming Notes,” we hope to keep you connected to what is happening at WBHM both internally and on-air. Have feedback you’d like to share? Or a programming question? Let me know!)

 

Meeting You Where You Are

Last week, I attended the Public Radio Content Conference – the premier gathering for non-commercial programmers, content managers and leaders in the public media ecosystem. This was the first in-person conference in more than two years and, it was good to reconnect with my colleagues in person — not just because of the pandemic, but […]

Rise and Shine

I spent early August substitute hosting Morning Edition for Miranda Fulmore who was on a well-deserved vacation. And while everyone has their routine, I thought I’d share a little bit of what goes on behind the scenes in the very early hours of the day. I get up at 3 a.m. which also means I really try […]

There’s Lots of Moth’s in the Air

This week, I’m writing about The Moth – not the insect, the storytelling phenomenon! If you haven’t heard, The Moth is true stories told live, without notes. It’s personal storytelling that connects us as human beings. These stories are told in different ways to millions of people each year including right here in the Heart […]

Welcome Back to Program Notes!

I spent a (mostly) restful two weeks off visiting with extended family – most of us hadn’t seen each other since before the pandemic. But even on vacation, I still listen to public radio wherever I am. Sure, I could (and often do) listen online, but there’s a part of me that’s also a fan […]

Deliberate Indifference – Inside Alabama’s Prison Crisis

You’ve probably heard of our new narrative podcast, Deliberate Indifference. And, given all the heavy news the past few months alone, you may think this is the last thing you want to listen to. I urge to reconsider. As citizens, we have a right to know how more than 500 million of our tax dollars […]

What’s in a name?

Every so often, I hear from listeners who politely (or sometimes not so politely) take WBHM to task for mispronouncing words. As Program Director, it’s my job to make sure we sound not just consistent on the air, but credible as well. Whether it’s a classical composer or name or place in the news, this […]

More Michael Krall's Program Notes Coverage